Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion During Breathing and Swallowing
Published on: December 1, 2023
Effect of Different Resistance Respiratory Muscle Training on Swallowing Muscle Activity in Patients With Poststroke
Pan-Pan Su1, Shu-Han Li2, Jiao Yang2
1The Affiliated Jiangsu Shengze Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate the activation characteristics of submental muscle (SM) and infrahyoid muscle (IM) in response to expiratory and inspiratory muscle training (EMT/IMT) at varying resistance loads in patients with poststroke dysphagia.
Method:
Twenty participants with poststroke dysphagia underwent surface electromyography during 5-ml water swallowing and graded EMT/IMT tasks. Key parameters including amplitude, duration, and root mean square (RMS) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance or the Friedman test, with post hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Results:
The peak amplitude of SM at 75% and 100% maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) was significantly higher than at lower MEP intensities (e.g., vs. 25% MEP, p = .002 and p < .001; vs. 50% MEP, p = .012 and p = .003) and all IMT intensities (all ps < .05). IM amplitude increased significantly at 80%-100% maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), exceeding both the swallowing task and all EMT tasks (all ps < .05). Except for the affected-side IM during the 80% and 100% MIP tasks, the activity duration of both SM and IM was significantly longer during the 100% MEP task compared to other MEP intensities and all IMT tasks (all ps < .05). RMS values for both muscle groups were elevated at higher respiratory muscle training (RMT) levels. No consistent side-to-side differences were found in most parameters. Borg Dyspnea Scale scores increased progressively with training intensity, with significant differences between high-intensity tasks (e.g., 100% MEP vs. 25% MEP, p < .001; 100% MEP vs. 50% MEP, p = .002; 100% MIP vs. 30% MIP, p < .001).
Conclusions:
EMT preferentially activates the SM group in a load-dependent manner, while IMT selectively recruits IM. These findings support the use of targeted, intensity-specific RMT for enhancing swallowing-related muscle activation in rehabilitation.