Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

13:19
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
Published on: March 13, 2021
Methodological challenges in machine learning and deep learning applied to food analysis: A critical review
Giorgio Felizzato1, Eloisa Bagnulo1, Giulia Tapparo1
1Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Via Giuria 9, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Journal of Chromatography. A
|June 18, 2026
Summary
Rigorous validation is crucial for reliable food analysis using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models require careful data handling and independent testing for accurate, transferable results in food chromatography.
Area of Science:
- Food Science
- Analytical Chemistry
- Data Science
Background:
- Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and Deep Learning (DL) are increasingly used in food analysis for quality control, authenticity, and chemical profiling.
- Chromatographic data, common in food analysis, presents challenges like high dimensionality, retention time variability, and multicollinearity, complicating ML/DL model development.
- Limited sample sizes in food studies hinder model generalization and transferability across different settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate methodological practices in ML and DL for food chromatography.
- To assess the impact of data construction, validation, and interpretation on model reliability and industrial applicability.
- To provide recommendations for developing robust and transferable ML models in food chromatography.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 165 peer-reviewed studies (2015-2025) on ML/DL in food chromatography.
- Case study using a coffee origin chromatographic dataset to examine class imbalance, training set size, and replicate handling.
- Analysis of validation strategies, including internal cross-validation versus external validation.
Main Results:
- High-fold cross-validation and Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation overestimate model accuracy compared to external validation.
- Treating analytical replicates as independent samples inflates performance metrics without enhancing true predictive power.
- Deep Learning (DL) models require larger datasets than Machine Learning (ML) models to prevent overfitting, with ML models often plateauing at moderate training sizes.
Conclusions:
- Rigorous validation strategies, particularly external validation, are essential for accurate assessment of ML/DL model performance in food chromatography.
- Careful management of chromatographic data, including proper handling of analytical replicates and class imbalance, is critical.
- Implementing these practices will lead to more robust, reproducible, and industrially transferable AI models for food analysis.