Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Altruism01:03

Altruism

Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
Inclusive Fitness00:57

Inclusive Fitness

Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systemic Degree of Perturbation of Plasma Markers Reveals Cumulative Biological Stress Across the Competitive Season in Professional Soccer Players.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

Breakthrough Pulmonary Nocardiosis Due to <i>Nocardia cyriacigeorgica</i> in a Lung Transplant Recipient in Brazil: A Case Report Highlighting Management Without Susceptibility Testing.

Case reports in infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Interferon gamma release assay and sputum GeneXpert positivity for tuberculosis burden detection in people deprived of liberty in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Blood transcriptomic signatures predict poor outcomes in drug-susceptible pulmonary TB in Brazil.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

IFNγ blockade in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected macaques alters the granuloma environment but not bacterial control.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Programmatic impact and cost-effectiveness of scaling up the short-course 3HP regimen for tuberculosis preventive treatment in Brazil.

BMJ global health·2026
Same journal

Determining the Relationship Between People's Explicit and Implicit Preferences for Gender-Inclusive Sexual and Reproductive Health Content: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Interactive journal of medical research·2026
Same journal

Barriers and Facilitators to Physician-Patient Communication in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals From the Perspectives of Hospital-Based Physicians and Patient Relations Coordinators: Qualitative Study.

Interactive journal of medical research·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Transparency, Auditability, and Reproducibility of Deduplication in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial for the Rayyan Method and Systematic Auto Resolver Feature.

Interactive journal of medical research·2026
Same journal

Identification of the Core Competencies Required in Endodontics for Undergraduate Students in Syrian Dental Schools by Using a Modified Delphi Technique: Prospective Exploratory Survey Study.

Interactive journal of medical research·2026
Same journal

Digital Interventions Addressing Cognitive and Psychological Symptoms in Long COVID: Scoping Review of Multicomponent Approaches.

Interactive journal of medical research·2026
Same journal

COVID-19 Rebound in Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir Treatment and Control Groups: Prospective Cohort Study.

Interactive journal of medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Generosity as a Scientific Method: Building Knowledge and Community in a Competitive World.

Bruno B Andrade1,2,3

  • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Room 441, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States, +1 410 622 6797.

Interactive Journal of Medical Research
|June 18, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Generosity in science is a research method that enhances rigor and impact by promoting openness and collaboration. Adopting generous practices in research design, governance, and evaluation fosters fairer knowledge production and greater public value.

Keywords:
generosityleadershipmentorshipopen scienceteam science

More Related Videos

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

Microbial Communities in Nature and Laboratory - Interview
29:13

Microbial Communities in Nature and Laboratory - Interview

Published on: May 28, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

Microbial Communities in Nature and Laboratory - Interview
29:13

Microbial Communities in Nature and Laboratory - Interview

Published on: May 28, 2007

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Research ethics
  • Open science

Background:

  • Traditional competition-driven models may limit scientific progress.
  • Global health challenges necessitate enhanced collaboration.
  • Existing research assessment metrics may incentivize suboptimal practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a conceptual and operational framework for "generosity in science."
  • To examine generosity as a practice at individual, collective, and institutional levels.
  • To offer alternatives to competition-driven knowledge production.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development.
  • Literature review on open science, team science, and research assessment.
  • Analysis of generosity in research design, governance, and evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Generosity, encompassing openness, credit-sharing, and data stewardship, improves scientific rigor, reproducibility, and impact.
  • Generosity functions as an epistemic engine, converting uncertainty into shared knowledge.
  • Practical principles for embedding generosity can counter vanity metrics and short-term incentives.

Conclusions:

  • Generosity is a critical component of scientific methodology, not merely altruism.
  • Implementing generous principles in research infrastructure leads to better questions and faster learning.
  • A pro-collaborative architecture, driven by generosity, is essential for addressing global challenges and distributing recognition fairly.