Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Development of consensus criteria for problematic medications in active duty service members
Ryan C Costantino1, Nicole J Brandt2, Eleanor M Perfetto2
1Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD, 20814; Center for Health Professions Education (CHPE), Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD, 20814; MEDCOM Pharmacy Readiness Program, Office of the US Army Surgeon General, Falls Church, VA, 22042; Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Background:
Medications play an essential role maintaining the health and readiness of active duty service members (ADSMs). Despite the importance of aligning medication use with operational requirements, there is no standardized, replicable framework for identifying Problematic Medications in Active Duty Service members (ProMADS).
Objective:
This study aimed to develop a consensus-based list of ProMADS criteria to inform medical readiness efforts across the Military Health System.
Methods:
A modified, two-round Delphi process was used to achieve expert consensus on explicit ProMADS criteria. Thirteen multidisciplinary panelists, selected for their clinical and operational expertise, independently reviewed and rated an existing set of ProMADS recommendations and rationales. Agreement was defined a priori as ≥75% of panelists endorsing both the recommendation and rationale. Panelists were invited to propose new criteria for consideration in Round 2. Responses were analyzed quantitatively for consensus and qualitatively for iterative refinement.
Results:
In Round 1, 10 of 17 (58.8%) criteria reached consensus. In Round 2, panelists reached consensus on all 17 previously introduced criteria and 4 of 7 (57.1%) new criteria suggested by participants, resulting in a final list of 21 consensus-based ProMADS criteria. Medications achieving consensus were generally categorized into five operationally relevant groups: Controlled Substances, Injectables, Refrigerated/Storage-Dependent Medications, Immunomodulators, and Blood Modifiers. Statements focused on operational feasibility such as avoidance of medications requiring frequent monitoring, refrigeration, or that might interfere with the treatment of a trauma injury.
Conclusion:
This study generated 21 consensus-driven ProMADS criteria, offering a replicable framework for identifying medications that may compromise deployment readiness. These findings can be integrated into clinical decision support, deployment screening, and policy development within the Military Health System.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Drug Regulation