Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
10:28

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT

Published on: January 22, 2018

Rules-Augmented GLM-5.1 Prompting for Four-Class Chest CT Protocol Selection.

Kartik Gupta1, Jaron Chong2

  • 1Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada. kartikg9@gmail.com.

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
|June 18, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple-Choice Question Positional Bias and Input Modality Effects in Multimodal Large Language Models.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Improves ChatGPT's Diagnostic Accuracy in Radiology.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2026
Same author

Deep Learning Models Connecting Images and Text: A Primer for Radiologists.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2025
Same author

A comparative study of machine learning models predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure: Enhancing risk estimation in over 25,000 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients.

Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery·2025
Same author

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4o and LLaMA 3-70b: Proprietary vs. open-source large language models in radiology.

Clinical imaging·2024
Same author

Laterality: A Potential Pitfall in Applying Multimodal Large Language Models to Radiology.

Radiology·2024
Same journal

Kolmogorov-Arnold Guided Local-Global Attention for Medical Image Classification.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Inner Ear Computed Tomography Analysis: Radiomics-Based Comparison of Affected and Unaffected Ears in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

High Adoption, Higher Expectations: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Radiologist Engagement with Artificial Intelligence in the United Arab Emirates.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Complex-valued Multi-scale Hybrid Attention Network for Fast MRI via Sparsified Data Learning.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Automatic Phase and Sequence Identification in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Liver MRI Using Deep Convolutional and Sequential Learning.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound-Based AI in Predicting Hormone Receptor Status in Breast Cancer: Is "Digital Biopsy" Possible.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Rule-augmented large language models (LLMs) show promise for radiology protocol selection. GLM-5.1 prompting performed comparably to classical methods on imbalanced chest CT data, supporting local rule encoding.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Natural Language Processing

Background:

  • Large language models (LLMs) are being explored for clinical applications, but their effectiveness in specific, imbalanced tasks like radiology protocol selection is not well-established.
  • Classical machine learning models and human expertise are current standards for radiology protocol selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of a rule-augmented LLM (GLM-5.1) against classical text classifiers for chest CT protocol selection.
  • To determine if LLM prompting can be competitive for small, imbalanced local tasks in medical imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 755 chest CT requests from a single Canadian center.
  • Comparison of GLM-5.1 with a classification-rules prompt against a majority baseline, random forest with TF-IDF and oversampling (RF-ROS), and fine-tuned BioClinicalBERT.
Keywords:
Class imbalanceGLM-5.1Large language modelsRadiology protocolingRule-augmented prompting

More Related Videos

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
04:40

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: August 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
10:28

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT

Published on: January 22, 2018

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
04:40

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: August 28, 2018

  • Models were evaluated on stratified 70:30 held-out splits using balanced accuracy and macro-F1 metrics.
  • Main Results:

    • GLM-5.1 achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.918 and macro-F1 of 0.838, outperforming the majority baseline and BioClinicalBERT.
    • GLM-5.1's performance was not significantly different from RF-ROS (p=0.82) or BioClinicalBERT (p=0.20).
    • GLM-5.1 correctly classified all 8 held-out interstitial lung disease CT cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Rule-augmented GLM-5.1 prompting is a feasible approach for radiology protocol selection in narrow, single-center tasks.
    • LLM performance was comparable to imbalance-aware classical machine learning methods.
    • Findings suggest local rule encoding is a viable adaptation strategy for LLMs, rather than a complete replacement for classical ML or human oversight.