Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance
Published on: February 13, 2026
Evaluation of bone formation within β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in a sheep scapular bioreactor model using
D S Abdullah Al Maruf1,2, Matt Darnell2, Jiongyu Ren3,4,5
1Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
None:
Critical-sized bone defects in load-bearing regions remain a major clinical challenge. This study investigated how β-tricalcium phosphate (βTCP) scaffold pore size and stem cell source influence bone regeneration using a laser-sintered, plasma-treated polyetherketone (P-PEK) dual-chamber scapular bioreactor model in sheep. On the left scapula, selectively polymerized βTCP (SP-βTCP) scaffolds with two pore sizes were implanted for 16 weeks: a Large Pore design (1.875-mm unit cell; 0.93-mm pore) and a Small Pore design (1.5-mm unit cell; 0.66-mm pore). Adjacent Large Pore scaffolds were loaded with either gelatine methacryloyl (GelMA) alone or GelMA encapsulating autologous adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). On the right scapula, Large Pore scaffolds containing GelMA-encapsulated autologous or allogeneic ADSCs were implanted for 12 weeks. Bone formation was quantified by micro-computed tomography (µCT) and validated by resin-embedded histology. Small Pore scaffolds generated greater bone volume than Large Pore scaffolds. Autologous ADSC-laden scaffolds outperformed GelMA-only controls, particularly in lower bioreactors interfacing with native bone. No significant differences were detected between autologous and allogeneic ADSCs. Histology confirmed bioreactor-dependent variation, with lower bone-contacting chambers consistently producing more mineralized tissue. These findings highlight the interplay among scaffold architecture, cell source and anatomical niche in optimizing translational bone regeneration.

