Serotonin-dopamine polarity and social polarization

This theoretical framework proposes that social polarization arises in part from an inherent neurochemical polarity in human groups. Variability in dopamine- and serotonin-linked approach-avoidance tendencies generates temperamental diversity that can be adaptive in small groups with dense, repeated interactions. When group size exceeds evolved cognitive limits on maintaining stable social relationships, these moderating mechanisms weaken, allowing unmoderated neurochemical differences to contribute to ideological division and reduced cross-group cooperation. The model integrates findings from neuroscience, behavioral genetics, evolutionary psychology, and cultural anthropology, emphasizing evolutionary mismatch between ancestral small-scale social environments and modern large-scale societies. Dunbar's number (~150) and its layered structure (approximately 5, 15, 50, 150) serve as a heuristic mediator: dense inner-layer interactions moderate polarity through reciprocal trust and accountability, while larger, more anonymous networks amplify it. Cultural norms, social identity processes, and digital platforms further moderate these dynamics. The framework yields testable predictions, including reduced affective polarization in structured small-group settings, and suggests interventions such as facilitated small-group dialogs. It remains speculative and calls for preregistered, multi-method empirical validation.