Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

DARE: An Explainable AI-visualization Framework for Ill-defined Decision Making.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same author

Structural evolution of a fungal cell wall protein family for β-glucan-binding and cell separation.

mBio·2026

Same author

DaV<sup>3</sup>is: Data Flow-Based Vulnerability Verification Through Visualization.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same author

Minding the Gap: A Quantitative Comparison of Distance Perception on Open vs. Closed Circles.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same author

Implementing endoscopy video recording in routine clinical practice: Strategies from three tertiary care centers.

Endoscopy international open·2025

Same author

ProHap Explorer: Visualizing Haplotypes in Proteogenomic Datasets.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2025

Same journal

GLLA: A Unified Force-Directed Graph Layout Framework Supporting Local Adjustments.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

Multi-Perception Crowd: Learning to combine entity and implicit perception for diverse crowd simulation.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

Hiding in Plain Sight: Camouflaging Real-world Objects.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

RTF2Mesh: Restricted Tangent Face Based Mesh Compression With Neural Displacement Fields.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

Practical Occluder Generation for Mobile Games.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

Spatial-temporal Relation guided Motion Transfer via Diffusion Model.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Evaluating Visual Decision Support: How Does Preference Elicitation Shape Metric Sensitivity?

Lena Cibulski, Tobias Mertz, Evanthia Dimara

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

|June 19, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding how preference elicitation methods impact decision quality metrics in visualization research is key. More expressive elicitation can improve sensitivity in detecting performance differences between visualization techniques.

More Related Videos

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

Information Visualization
Human-Computer Interaction
Decision Science

Background:

Evaluating visualization effectiveness for decision-making is challenging due to a lack of objective metrics.
Previous work used choice consistency with subjective preferences, but elicitation design impact is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how different preference elicitation methods affect the sensitivity of decision quality metrics.
To understand the influence of elicitation expressiveness on metrics used in comparative visualization studies.

Main Methods:

A preregistered study with 548 participants compared parallel coordinates and tabular visualizations.
Varied the expressiveness of preference elicitation methods across three conditions.
Measured the sensitivity of choice consistency metrics to detect performance differences.

Main Results:

A baseline condition with simple elicitation confirmed previous inconclusive findings on visualization performance.
More expressive preference elicitation showed potential to increase metric sensitivity.
Further increases in expressiveness did not yield additional benefits in sensitivity for this study.

Conclusions:

Elicitation design significantly influences the sensitivity of decision-centric metrics in visualization studies.
More expressive elicitation can enhance the detection of performance differences, informing metric development.
Findings guide the interpretation of comparative visualization research and metric design.