Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Comet Assay to Quantify DNA Damage in FLT3 Mutant-expressing 32D Cells after Exposure to Type I and Type II FLT3 Inhibitors
Published on: October 17, 2025
Efficacy of Second-Generation FLT3 Inhibitors in FLT3-Mutated AML: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Qili Yu1, Jingni Cao2, Yixia Chen3
1Emergency Medical Center, Ningbo Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Ningbo, China.
Introduction:
Second-generation FLT3 inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy in FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), although results across randomized trials remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-generation FLT3 inhibitors in patients with FLT3-mutated AML.
Methods:
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (from inception to August 2025) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating second-generation FLT3 inhibitors for treating FLT3-mutated AML. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251132477).
Results:
This meta-analysis included eight RCTs involving 2,231 patients. The second-generation FLT3 inhibitors evaluated were gilteritinib and quizartinib, and control treatments included placebo or active non-FLT3-inhibitor regimens. Patients treated with second-generation FLT3 inhibitors exhibited significant improvements in both OS (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62-0.84; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.86; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that gilteritinib showed improvements in both OS (HR: 0.71, p = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.71, p < 0.001), and quizartinib significantly improved OS (HR: 0.72, p = 0.013) with no significant difference in PFS (HR: 0.75, p = 0.142). Among patients with newly diagnosed AML, second-generation FLT3 inhibitors did not significantly improve PFS (HR: 0.73, p = 0.127) but significantly improved OS (HR: 0.80, p = 0.037). Among patients with relapsed/refractory AML, significant benefits were observed in both OS (HR: 0.67, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.74, p = 0.04). Benefits were observed across both placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials.
Conclusion:
Second-generation FLT3 inhibitors significantly improve survival outcomes in FLT3-mutated AML, particularly for gilteritinib and in relapsed/refractory disease. Further studies are needed to clarify mutation subtype-specific and dose-specific effects.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
