Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Analysis of Human T Cell Activity in an Allogeneic Co-Culture Setting of Pre-Treated Tumor Cells
Published on: March 7, 2025
Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Fenghua Liu1, Lili Wang1, Qiao Sun1
1Department of Gynecology, The People's Hospital of Huantai, No. 2198 Huantai Avenue, Huantai County, Zibo City, Shandong 256400, China.
Objectives:
This study aimed to assess the incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cervical cancer (CC) therapy and provide clinical recommendations to ensure their safe, rational, and effective use.
Methods:
This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420251133016. A systematic search following the PICO guidelines was conducted across PubMed (n = 71), Embase (n = 321), Web of Science (n = 174), and the Cochrane Library (n = 291) databases from May 30, 2026, without any language limitations. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled phase III trials (RCTs) that reported treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the context of ICI-based cervical cancer treatments.
Results:
Five RCTs involving a total of 3,302 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria. When compared to the control group consisting of standard chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy, the incidence of trAEs of any grade or treatment-related death was not found to be significantly associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (RR: 1.00, [95 % CI] 0.99 to 1.01, p = 0.98; RR: 1.44, [95 % CI] 0.69 to 2.97, p = 0.33, respectively). But, the incidence of grade 3 or higher trAEs, irAEs of any grade, grade 3 or higher irAEs, and treatment-related discontinuation was significantly associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with placebo (RR: 1.07, [95 % CI] 1.03 to 1.11, p = 0.001; RR: 2.80, [95 % CI] 1.71 to 4.58, p < 0.001; RR: 4.60, [95 % CI] 2.70 to 7.84, p < 0.001; RR: 1.41, [95 % CI] 1.08 to 1.84p = 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion:
This meta-analysis summarizes the AE profile of ICIs in cervical cancer treatment. These results indicate that ICI-based regimens exhibit comparable overall general toxicity to standard cervical cancer therapies. Nevertheless, the increased immune-related and high-grade toxicities constitute unique safety risks of ICIs. Close clinical monitoring and targeted toxicity management are therefore essential to ensure the safe and stable clinical application of ICIs in cervical cancer treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity