Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver
Published on: June 27, 2025
Estimating changes in systolic blood pressure based on pulse wave morphology using paired segment comparison
Matthieu Scherpf1, Hannes Ernst-Völker1, Hagen Malberg1
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
This study introduces a new method using photoplethysmography (PPG) to estimate changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP). The approach shows potential for continuous blood pressure monitoring by filling gaps between traditional cuff-based measurements.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Physiological Monitoring
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
Background:
- Continuous non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring is limited, as cuff-based methods provide intermittent readings and miss short-term systolic blood pressure (SBP) fluctuations.
- Existing photoplethysmogram (PPG)-based SBP estimation methods often require calibration due to subject-specific vascular properties, limiting their generalizability.
- There is a need for accurate, continuous, and non-invasive methods to monitor blood pressure, especially during sleep or when cuff inflations are disruptive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a learning-based approach for estimating the change in systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) using PPG signals.
- To overcome the limitations of current PPG-based SBP estimation by focusing on relative changes rather than absolute values.
- To assess the performance and stability of the proposed ΔSBP estimation method across diverse patient datasets and over extended periods.
Main Methods:
- A learning-based algorithm was implemented to compare pairs of 20-second PPG segments to estimate ΔSBP.
- The approach was developed and validated on a large cohort of 12,279 patients from the VitalDB and MIMIC-III datasets, with a held-out test set of 2,457 patients.
- Performance was quantified using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Cohen's kappa (κ).
Main Results:
- The PPG-based ΔSBP estimation achieved an RMSE of 14.53/11.37 mmHg and a correlation (r) of 0.79/0.65 on the VitalDB/MIMIC-III test sets.
- Model predictions showed a stronger correlation with SBP than heart rate, indicating reliance on pulse wave morphology.
- Stable ΔSBP estimation was demonstrated over a 28-hour period, with errors primarily occurring when waveform changes were minimal despite significant ΔSBP.
Conclusions:
- The study supports the potential of morphology-based relative blood pressure estimation using PPG signals.
- The developed approach can potentially complement cuff-based monitoring by providing continuous SBP trend data between intermittent measurements.
- This method could be particularly valuable during sleep or in situations where cuff inflations are undesirable or impractical.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Measurement of Blood Pressure
