Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids
Published on: March 17, 2016
Clinical Validation of the Roche cobas and cobas 4800 Human Papillomavirus Tests on Self-Collected Vaginal Dry Swabs
David Hawkes1, Desuba Gurung2, Eunice Pineda2
1Australian HPV Reference Laboratory, Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Carlton, Victoria, Australia; Departments of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Pathology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Laboratory Medicine, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia.
None:
The first national human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening programs began in 2017. Since then, a growing list of countries have moved, or want to move, to HPV-based screening. One of the benefits of HPV-based screening is that a sample does not need to be collected from the cervix by a health care practitioner. Self-collection has been demonstrated to give equivalent accuracy as practitioner-collected specimens when a PCR-based clinically validated HPV assay is used. However, there are few clinically validated, PCR-based, HPV assays with on-label claims for self-collection. The current study, Self-Collection or Practitioner-Collection Evaluation 2 (SCoPE2), undertook a Validation of Human Papillomavirus Assays and Collection Devices for Self-Samples and Urine Samples (VALHUDES) protocol evaluation with individuals recruited in a colposcopy population in the context of an HPV-based screening program. SCoPE2 recruited 400 participants who each took a self-collected vaginal sample using a FLOQSwab. A practitioner-collected cervical sample was then collected at colposcopy. HPV testing was performed using both the cobas 4800 and the cobas HPV tests. The self-collected specimens demonstrated equivalent and noninferior relative sensitivity for histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade ≥2 (n = 58) when compared with the practitioner-collected specimen for both the cobas 4800 (0.982) and cobas (1.037), but relative specificity was inferior. Additional analyses were undertaken to resolve referral, self-collected, and practitioner-collected discordant results. SCoPE2 demonstrates that the assessed self-collection method is noninferior for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade ≥2 when compared with a practitioner-collected specimen.
