Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Fabrication, Operation and Flow Visualization in Surface-acoustic-wave-driven Acoustic-counterflow Microfluidics
Published on: August 27, 2013
Gas flow through micro-capillaries - which flow law is most suitable to predict the flow rate through
Christian Proff1, Charles E Pierce2, Irwann Le Bouquin3
1F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Global Device Development Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland christian.proff@roche.com.
This study shows that the slip-flow model accurately predicts helium flow in capillaries for pharmaceutical Container Closure Integrity testing under constant pressure. The modified Knudsen model is best for varying pressure conditions.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Science
- Fluid Dynamics
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Capillaries are crucial positive controls for Container Closure Integrity (CCI) testing in pharmaceutical quality control.
- Standard gas flow models struggle with the transitional flow regime in capillaries, impacting the reliability of detecting sub-micron defects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive performance of classical, slip-flow, and modified Knudsen models for helium flow through capillaries relevant to CCI testing.
- To determine the most suitable model for simulating leak rates under varying pressure conditions.
Main Methods:
- Investigated helium flow through capillaries (sub-micron to 25 μm) across a range of leak rates (10⁻⁹ to 10⁻³ mbar l/s).
- Evaluated classical, slip-flow, and modified Knudsen models under differential pressures (250–4000 mbar).
- Compared model performance at constant 1000 mbar pressure difference versus variable pressure dependencies.
Main Results:
- The slip-flow model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (within 30% tolerance) under a constant 1 bar pressure difference.
- Simpler models failed to capture the pressure-dependent flow transition in capillaries of varying diameters.
- The modified Knudsen model accurately described the shift in flow behavior across the entire diameter range under variable pressure.
Conclusions:
- Model selection for CCI testing is context-dependent, requiring consideration of pressure conditions.
- The slip-flow model is recommended for constant pressure scenarios, while the modified Knudsen model is better for variable pressure characterization.
- These findings provide a framework for optimizing CCI testing by selecting appropriate flow models for specific leak limits and conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Pipe Flowrate Measurement
The orifice meter is a simple,...
Steady, Laminar Flow in Circular Tubes
Laminar Flow: Problem Solving
Poiseuille's Law and Reynolds Number
Turbulent Flow: Problem Solving
Temperature is a key factor in CO2 solubility. In this case, the CO2 gas and the liquid are cooled to 20°C. Lower temperatures enhance...
Laminar Flow
