Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
Published on: September 25, 2014
Factors associated with return-to-sport outcomes following pathogen-confirmed acute respiratory infections in
Marcel Jooste1,2, Nicola Sewry1,3, Maarit Valtonen4
1Sport Exercise Medicine and Lifestyle Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Objective:
To identify factors associated with return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes following confirmed acute respiratory infections (ARinf) in athletes.
Methods:
This prospective cohort study included 114 confirmed ARinf cases among athletic individuals. Causative pathogens were identified using multiplex PCR testing, and illness severity was classified per International Olympic Committee consensus (mild, moderate and severe). RTS outcomes included time (days) to return-to-training (RTT), return-to-full-training (RTFT) and return-to-full-performance (RTFP). Cox regression models (HRs) assessed associations between RTS outcomes and demographics, sport participation, pathogen groups and illness severity.
Results:
The median (IQR) days to RTT were 3.5 (0-7), RTFT 8 (6-11) and RTFP 11 (7-14). Amateur athletes had prolonged RTS outcomes (HR range=0.51-0.59; p≤0.03) compared with professional athletes. RTS outcomes differed between the most common pathogen groups: influenza and SARS-CoV-2 had longer RTS than rhinovirus (HR range=0.11-0.23; p≤0.003). Severe illness was associated with prolonged RTS outcomes compared with mild and moderate illnesses (HR range=0.17-0.31; p<0.0001). Pathogen-related differences in RTS persisted within each severity group. Within mild/moderate illnesses, the influenza/SARS-CoV-2 subgroup had longer RTS than rhinovirus (HRs: RTT=0.35; RTFT=0.05; RTFP=0.06; p<0.05) and within severe illnesses (HRs: RTT=0.23; RTFT=0.21; RTFP=0.13; p≤0.01).
Conclusion:
Factors associated with RTS outcomes following ARinf in athletes are level of sport participation, illness severity at presentation and the causative pathogen. Clinical assessment of illness severity remains valuable in RTS decision-making, particularly in low-resource settings. However, identifying the causative pathogen may provide additional predictive value and refine RTS clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...