Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Effectiveness of magnets in removing metallic foreign bodies
Okan Aslantürk1, Emre Ergen1, Mustafa Karakaplan1
1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Background:
Metallic foreign bodies (MFB) in the extremities are a common clinical problem that requires removal to prevent complications and to avoid contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. While magnetic extraction represents an alternative to conventional surgical techniques, systematic data regarding its efficacy and clinical utility remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of magnetic extraction for MFBs in extremities, its impact on radiation exposure, and success rates across different anatomical locations and foreign body types.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed data on patients who underwent MFB removal surgery between 2017 and 2025 at a tertiary trauma center. Of the 364 patients reviewed, 51 met the inclusion criteria after excluding non-metallic foreign bodies, cases in which magnets were not used, and incomplete records. Demographic data, anatomical location, foreign body characteristics, use of image intensifier, and magnet efficiency were recorded.
Results:
A magnet was used for 52 MFBs in 51 patients. Magnetic extraction of MFBs was successful in 87% (45/52) of cases. The success rate was 100% for metal splinters but decreased to 63% for the needle-type foreign bodies (p < 0.001). Magnetic extraction succeeded in all upper-extremity cases (28/28, 100%) and in 68.2% (15/22) of lower-extremity cases; the single patient with bilateral involvement was successfully managed at both sites (p = 0.003, Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test). In 70% of all cases and 80% of magnet successful cases, the image intensifier was not used. Stratified analysis by anatomical location revealed that the inverse relationship between image-intensifier use and magnet-only success was particularly pronounced in lower extremity cases (p = 0.020).
Conclusion:
Magnet-assisted extraction is an easy and feasible method with high success rates for MFB removal. The use of a magnet may reduce radiation exposure during MFB removal. Its efficacy decreases at lower-extremity sites, particularly in the sole, and with needle-type foreign bodies. These findings indicate that magnetic extraction of MFBs should be planned according to anatomical location and foreign body type.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetism
An individual magnetic pole cannot be isolated. No matter how small, every piece of a magnet contains a north pole and a south...
Eddy Currents
Other major applications of eddy currents appear in metal detectors and the braking systems of trains and roller...
Ferromagnetism
Magnetic Damping
If, however, the bob is a slotted metal plate, the magnet produces a much smaller effect. When a slotted metal plate enters the field, an emf is induced by the change in flux; however, it is less effective because the slots limit the...
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
Diamagnetism
Diamagnetism was discovered by Anton Brugmans in 1778 when he observed that bismuth gets repelled by magnetic fields, thus theorizing that diamagnets get repelled by magnets.

