Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
Adherence to 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force Guidelines for Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: a Multicenter Real-Time
Kacey Idouchi1,2, Wasif Hassan3, Mathew J Gregoski4,5
1Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Clinical Sciences Building, Suite 908, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. kacey.idouchi@stonybrookmedicine.edu.
Adherence to 2020 colonoscopy surveillance guidelines remains suboptimal, with early surveillance common for hyperplastic polyps and low-risk adenomas. High-risk adenomas often experience delayed follow-up, indicating implementation gaps.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopy
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- The U.S. Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) issued updated guidelines in 2020 recommending less frequent post-polypectomy surveillance.
- Despite updated guidelines, premature colonoscopies and suboptimal adherence to surveillance intervals persist.
- This study investigates adherence trends and influencing factors five years after the 2020 guideline release.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate adherence to the 2020 USMSTF colonoscopy surveillance guidelines.
- To determine if adherence has improved over time since the guidelines were published.
- To identify factors associated with non-adherence to recommended surveillance intervals.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective cohort study included 452 patients undergoing their first surveillance colonoscopy between 2020 and 2025.
- Pathology findings from index and surveillance colonoscopies were analyzed, categorizing lesions as hyperplastic polyps (HPs), low-risk adenomas (LRAs), or high-risk adenomas (HRAs).
- Surveillance timing was classified as early or late if performed more than six months outside the recommended interval.
Main Results:
- Early surveillance occurred in 58% of first surveillance colonoscopies, while late surveillance occurred in 13%.
- Early surveillance was significantly more common for patients with only HPs (82%) and LRAs (64%).
- Patients with HRAs were more likely to experience delayed surveillance (OR 0.096). Early surveillance rates showed variability by year, increasing from 46% in 2020 to 60% in 2025.
Conclusions:
- Adherence to the 2020 USMSTF colonoscopy surveillance guidelines remains suboptimal five years post-publication.
- There are persistent gaps in the implementation of recommended post-polypectomy surveillance protocols.
- The findings underscore the need for improved strategies to ensure guideline adherence for optimal colorectal cancer prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination