Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods01:19

Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods

In argentometric precipitation titrations, endpoints can be detected visually by the Mohr, Volhard, and Fajans methods. In the Mohr method, adding a soluble chromate indicator gives an initial yellow color to the analyte solution. As the titrant is added, the first excess of silver ions forms a red silver chromate precipitate, marking the endpoint. The solution pH should be maintained at about 8 by adding solid CaCO3.
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
Precipitation Gravimetry01:03

Precipitation Gravimetry

Precipitation gravimetry is based on converting an analyte into a sparingly soluble precipitate, which is separated by filtration and weighed. An ideal precipitate should be pure, insoluble, of known composition, and easily filtered from the reaction mixture.
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiation dose assessments for generic nuclear power plants part I: Routine operation.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2024
Same author

Appraisal of surface-groundwater anthropogenic indicators and associated human health risk in El Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.

Journal of water and health·2023
Same author

Impact of reduced flow on <sup>137</sup>Cs behavior in Ismailia Canal and surrounding groundwater systems.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2020
Same author

Anticoagulation with bivalirudin during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Texas Heart Institute journal·2015
Same author

Outcomes of open surgical repair for chronic type B aortic dissections.

Journal of vascular surgery·2014
Same author

Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac structure and function in obese Egyptian adolescents.

Cardiology in the young·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Dissolved Solute Sampling Across an Oxic-Anoxic Soil-Water Interface Using Microdialysis Profilers
11:43

Dissolved Solute Sampling Across an Oxic-Anoxic Soil-Water Interface Using Microdialysis Profilers

Published on: March 24, 2023

Ensemble machine learning method for δ18O prediction in groundwater.

Faten A Mohamed1, Mostafa Sadek2, Nema Mohamed Kandil2

  • 1Nuclear and Radiological Safety Research Center (NRSRC), Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), Cairo, Egypt. chemfaten@gmail.com.

Scientific Reports
|June 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models can predict groundwater oxygen isotopes (δ18O) in arid regions using hydrochemical data. However, spatial factors significantly influence accuracy, necessitating cautious interpretation for site-specific applications.

Keywords:
EgyptGBRGroundwater managementRFRδ18O variability prediction

More Related Videos

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
06:37

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds

Published on: November 13, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Dissolved Solute Sampling Across an Oxic-Anoxic Soil-Water Interface Using Microdialysis Profilers
11:43

Dissolved Solute Sampling Across an Oxic-Anoxic Soil-Water Interface Using Microdialysis Profilers

Published on: March 24, 2023

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
06:37

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds

Published on: November 13, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Hydrogeology
  • Environmental Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Interpreting groundwater oxygen isotopes (δ18O) in arid zones is complex due to intricate recharge patterns, salinization, and sparse data.
  • Existing methods often struggle with the heterogeneity of arid environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of ensemble machine learning models for predicting groundwater δ18O in the mid-Nile Valley.
  • To identify key hydrochemical and spatial predictors of groundwater δ18O.
  • To assess the reliability and limitations of machine learning predictions in data-scarce arid regions.

Main Methods:

  • Applied Random Forest, Lasso, and Gradient Boosting models to predict δ18O using hydrochemical and spatial variables.
  • Utilized both random splitting and spatial cross-validation for model performance assessment.
  • Conducted sensitivity analysis by excluding spatial variables to isolate the influence of hydrochemical factors.

Main Results:

  • Random Forest outperformed other models under random splitting (R2 = 0.83).
  • Model performance significantly decreased under spatial cross-validation, indicating the importance of spatial structure.
  • Longitude, chloride, potassium, and magnesium were identified as primary predictors.
  • Hydrochemical variables alone explained approximately 40% of the δ18O variance.
  • Prediction uncertainty increased substantially for samples outside the data-rich range.

Conclusions:

  • Ensemble machine learning offers a valuable tool for groundwater isotope prediction in data-limited arid regions.
  • Spatial effects are crucial and must be considered for accurate δ18O interpretation.
  • Model predictions are most reliable for site-specific analyses within the established data range.
  • Further research requires collecting more end-member samples to improve predictions in underrepresented isotopic ranges.