Related Experiment Videos
Determining Ethnic Disparities Inherent to Tier 3 Vs. Tier 4 Carrier Screening
Vaishali Mehta1, Emily B Rosenfeld2, Julia Geltch3
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Insights
Tier 4 carrier screening panels identify more carriers across diverse ethnic groups than traditional Tier 3 panels. Universal Tier 4 screening is recommended for better carrier ascertainment and lower number needed to screen (NNS) in all populations.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Population Health
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Carrier screening panels traditionally use frequency thresholds based on European populations.
- This approach may lead to ethnic disparities in carrier status ascertainment.
- Underrepresented ethnic groups may be missed by current screening methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate ethnic disparities in carrier status ascertainment between Tier 3 and Tier 4 screening panels.
- Assess the utility of Tier 4-only screening in ethnically diverse cohorts.
- Determine the prevalence and number needed to screen (NNS) for Tier 4 variants across different regions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 2000 adults undergoing carrier screening.
- Ethnicity mapping to UN Geoscheme regions for analysis.
- Calculation of prevalence and NNS for Tier 4-only variants by geographic region and ancestral subgroup.
Main Results:
- 65.7% of patients carried at least one Tier 4-only variant, with high prevalence across most ancestral subgroups.
- NNS for Tier 4-only carriers ranged from 1.0 to 2.2, most efficient in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe.
- Carrier couples were identified with NNS from 7.3 to 58.1 across regions.
Conclusions:
- Tier 3 panels inadequately identify carriers in underrepresented ethnic groups.
- Tier 4 panels offer superior carrier ascertainment in diverse populations with lower NNS.
- Universal Tier 4 carrier screening is supported by these findings.
Objective:
To evaluate ethnic disparities in carrier status ascertainment between Tier 3 (conditions with carrier frequency ≥ 1/200) and Tier 4 panels (conditions with carrier frequencies < 1/200), and to assess the utility of Tier 4-only screening in an ethnically diverse cohort.
Methods:
This IRB-approved retrospective chart review included adults undergoing carrier screening panel between January 2020 and April 2024, with self-reported ethnicities mapped to regions based on the United Nations Geoscheme, a system to group countries into regions used for analysis. We calculated the prevalence and number needed to screen (NNS) for Tier 4-only variants across geographic regions and ancestral subgroups.
Results:
Among 2000 patients, 65.7% carried at least one Tier 4-only variant across the cohort, with most ancestral subgroups showing ≥ 60% prevalence. NNS to detect one Tier 4-only carrier ranged from 1.0 to 2.2, with the greatest efficiency in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe. Carrier couples were identified across multiple regions, with NNS ranging from 7.3 to 58.1.
Conclusions:
Tier 3 panels rely on carrier frequency thresholds largely derived from European populations and fail to identify carriers in underrepresented ethnic groups. Tier 4 panels provide greater carrier ascertainment across diverse populations and yield lower NNS. Our data support universal Tier 4 carrier screening.
Related Concept Videos
Test for Homogeneity
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination