Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

07:00
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Remote programming of cochlear implants: a mixed-methods study of audiologist experiences and patient satisfaction
Mustafa Yüksel1, Şengül Terlemez2, Merve Bayri Ulukan3
1Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.
International Journal of Audiology
|June 22, 2026
Summary
Remote programming (RP) for cochlear implants (CIs) is effective, especially for follow-up care. Initial activations present challenges, suggesting hybrid models are best for optimal remote audiological care.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Medical Technology
- Telehealth
Background:
- Remote programming (RP) is increasingly used for cochlear implant (CI) management.
- Understanding audiologist perspectives and patient satisfaction is crucial for optimizing RP.
- Current literature lacks comprehensive insights into both clinician and patient experiences with CI RP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore audiologists' views on remote programming for cochlear implants.
- To compare patient satisfaction with remote programming during initial CI activation versus follow-up sessions.
- To identify key themes influencing the implementation and success of CI remote programming.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach combining qualitative interviews with audiologists and quantitative surveys of CI users.
- Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with six experienced audiologists.
- Descriptive and comparative analysis of satisfaction surveys from 136 CI users (44 initial activation, 92 follow-up).
Main Results:
- Audiologists identified advantages, challenges, technical needs, and professional satisfaction related to RP.
- CI users reported significantly higher satisfaction with RP during follow-up sessions compared to initial activation across most items.
- Both groups highly rated technical quality and communication, with follow-up users showing greater ease and confidence with RP.
Conclusions:
- Remote programming is a viable option for cochlear implant management, particularly for follow-up appointments.
- Initial CI activations require tailored approaches, potentially involving hybrid care models, to address unique challenges.
- Successful remote audiological care necessitates robust infrastructure, effective communication, and standardized professional training.
