Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
Published on: June 21, 2019
Edible agents with perceptible minds: A psychological study of human perception in human-food interaction
Takuma Shimoyama1, Yuya Kume1, Mei Yamagata2
1Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
Investigating the psychological and cognitive mechanisms of eating living beings is important for understanding ethical judgments and decision-making in eating behaviors. For example, the meat paradox describes a conflict about harming animals for food. In addition, perceiving a mind in a target has been shown to influence ethical judgment. However, experimentally investigating such food-related ethical themes is difficult, particularly when using actual animals, due to ethical constraints. Therefore, this study proposes an experimental framework using edible agents. Previous research developed a movable edible robot and examined the psychological and cognitive effects of eating moving food. Building on this, we developed an edible agent capable of social interaction through vocalization and evaluated its psychological effects. We examined how people perceive the minds of edible agents with different vocalization types and behaviors, and how this perception influences reluctance to eat and guilt. In the experiment, participants (N = 1,094) viewed two videos in which edible agents exhibited different vocalizations and movements and evaluated their impressions. Factor analysis of 18 mind-perception items extracted two factors-Agency and Experience-with a cumulative contribution of 57.8% ([Formula: see text] and 0.862, respectively). Agency scores were significantly higher in Video 1 than in Video 2 (W = 481,686, p < .001, r = 0.800), whereas Experience scores were higher in Video 2 (W = 75,619, p < .001, r = 0.717). Reluctance to eat differed significantly (W = 32,018, p < .001, r = 0.270), whereas guilt showed no significant difference (W = 23,369, p = .103, r = 0.108). However, no significant relationship was observed between mind perception and either reluctance to eat or guilt. This study provides new insights into social interactions between humans and edible artificial objects, highlighting the potential of edible agents to deepen understanding of food culture and its ethical dimensions.
Related Concept Videos
Taste Buds and Receptors
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
Gustation
The Physiology of Taste
Subliminal Perception
Extrasensory Perception
Precognition involves foreseeing future events, such as predicting an accident before it happens. An example of precognition could be someone dreaming about a specific event, like a car crash, which then occurs...

