Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
Published on: December 10, 2012
W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators
Yukito Iba1,2
1Zen University, Zushi, Kanagawa 249-0007, Japan.
None:
Evaluating the variability of posterior estimates is a key aspect of Bayesian model assessment. In this study, we focus on the posterior covariance matrix W, defined through the log likelihoods of individual observations. Previous studies, notably MacEachern and Peruggia (2002) and Thomas et al. (2018), examined the role of the principal space of W in Bayesian sensitivity analysis. Here, we show that the principal space of W is also central to frequentist evaluation, using the recently proposed Bayesian infinitesimal jackknife (Bayesian IJ) approximation (Giordano & Broderick, 2023) as a key tool. We further clarify the relationship between W and the Fisher kernel, showing that a modified version of the Fisher kernel can be viewed as an approximation to W. Moreover, the matrix W itself can be interpreted as a reproducing kernel, which we refer to as the W-kernel. Based on this connection, we investigate the relation between the W-kernel formulation in the data space and the classical asymptotic formulation in the parameter space. We also introduce the matrix Z, which is effectively dual to W in the sense of PCA; this formulation provides another perspective on the relationship between W and classical asymptotic theory. In the appendixes, we explore approximate bootstrap methods for posterior means and show that projection onto the principal space of W facilitates frequentist evaluation when higher-order terms are included. In addition, we introduce incomplete Cholesky decomposition as an efficient method for computing the principal space of W and discuss the concept of representative subsets of observations.
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Probability in Statistics
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
