Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home
Published on: March 1, 2024
Understanding patient and physician global assessments in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-epidemiological study of core
Philip Rask Lage-Hansen1, Tobias Haugegaard2, Bjørk Khaliqi Sofíudóttir3
1Department of Rheumatology, Esbjerg Hospital, Denmark; Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Denmark; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Objective:
To assess agreement between physician and patient global assessment improvements in randomised controlled trials (RCT) of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis and to identify which core outcome domains best explain changes in each assessment and their discrepancies.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-epidemiological analysis of RCTs comparing targeted therapies with placebo. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for all eight RA-COS domains: Physician global assessment, Patient global assessment, Disability, Tender joint count (TJC), Swollen joint count (SJC), Pain, Acute phase reactants, and Fatigue. Agreement between physician and patient assessments was assessed as ΔSMD Global (i.e., SMD Physician global assessment - SMD Patient global assessment). Multivariate meta-analyses were performed to calculate SMD for the remaining domains. Multiple imputation followed by meta-regression analyses identified domain-level predictors of global assessment changes.
Results:
We identified 73 double-blind RCTs (165 randomised comparisons) involving 33,956 RA patients. Physician assessments demonstrated slightly greater treatment effects (SMD -0.60; 95% CI -0.65 to -0.55) compared with patient assessments (SMD -0.50; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.46): ΔSMDGlobal = -0.09 (95% CI -0.12 to -0.05). Univariable meta-regression identified disability, TJC and SJC as the strongest associations of both assessments, yet SJC was the only domain significantly associated with the contrast between these (ΔSMDGlobal). Pain was independently associated only with patient global assessment.
Conclusion:
Targeted therapies show larger improvements in physician-assessed outcomes than on patient-reported outcomes, largely driven by SJC. Pain remains a distinct determinant of patient assessments, underscoring the need to better integrate patient-reported outcomes into RA trial design.
Registration:
The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (2025-02-14).
Registration Number:
CRD420250652342.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction