Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Considerations for using atrial fibrillation burden as a surrogate endpoint: A report from the Cardiovascular
Krishna Pundi1, Charu Gandotra2, William Sanders2
1Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, a new measure of AF recurrence, can accelerate clinical trials. This patient-centric endpoint uses modern technology to better predict AF-related risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Current atrial fibrillation (AF) management prioritizes early rhythm control to mitigate AF-related risks and enhance patient quality of life.
- Existing AF clinical trials utilize outdated treatment failure definitions, such as minimal AF recurrence or infrequent traditional endpoints (stroke, heart failure, death), which are inadequate for contemporary patient populations.
- There is a need for a direct, clinically meaningful measure to assess treatment efficacy in AF trials, potentially accelerating research and reducing costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and establish atrial fibrillation (AF) burden as a validated surrogate clinical endpoint for AF rhythm control trials.
- To outline a roadmap for the collaborative validation of AF burden as a surrogate endpoint.
- To provide standards for measuring AF burden across various devices and modalities.
Main Methods:
- A Think Tank convened experts from science, clinical practice, regulatory bodies, and industry to develop a strategy for AF burden validation.
- Review of existing data supporting AF burden as a surrogate endpoint.
- Development of measurement standards and a collaborative validation roadmap.
Main Results:
- The document reviews current evidence supporting AF burden as a surrogate endpoint.
- Standards for AF burden measurement using contemporary devices are proposed.
- A practical roadmap for collaborative validation of AF burden is established.
Conclusions:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden offers a patient-centric approach, moving beyond historical treatment success metrics.
- Leveraging modern monitoring technology, AF burden can serve as an early indicator of AF-related risk.
- Validating AF burden as a surrogate endpoint can significantly enhance the efficiency and relevance of AF clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

