Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
Published on: May 10, 2016
Why do occupational hygienists and physicians fail to communicate and collaborate when faced with chemicals in the
Julia M van Beekum1,2,3, Dorine van Geuns1, Floor Stuit1
1Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Outpatient Clinic Occupational Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Workers who handle hazardous substances are at risk of health impairments, occupational diseases and even premature death. Occupational diseases are preventable, but early detection, diagnosis and intervention remain inadequate. Therefore, we aim to gain insight into the determinants of timely identification of health effects caused by exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace as perceived by occupational health professionals.
Methods:
We conducted seventeen online semi-structured interviews among Dutch occupational hygienists and occupational physicians on their perspectives and experiences in identifying chemical-related health effects in the workplace. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and the data were analysed using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model.
Results:
Occupational hygienists and occupational physicians experience limited knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for timely identification of chemical-related health effects. These modifiable determinants hinder effective collaboration between these occupational health professionals in translating exposure to hazardous substances into health effects and vice versa. Moreover, different system-level determinants in the Netherlands further impede this collaboration. Existing tools for occupational health professionals reinforce this gap by supporting either exposure assessment or health effect evaluation, rarely bridging the two. As a result, current tools are often tailored to a single professional group.
Conclusions:
The results from our study suggest that gaps in knowledge, skills and self-efficacy hinder timely identification of chemical-related health effects in the Netherlands. The findings of this study can inform the development of multidisciplinary interventions and multifaceted strategies aimed at improving prevention of chemical-related occupational disease and timely implementation of appropriate (workplace) measures.
More Related Videos
05:07Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles
Published on: March 18, 2019
06:27Automated Hospital Room Disinfection Utilizing a Novel Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide Microdroplet Disbursing Technology
Published on: February 24, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Obedience
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and patients...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...