Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

06:18
Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
Published on: May 24, 2024
C1 pedicle screw placement risks in patients with ponticulus posticus: a CTA retrospective simulation study
Ping Wang1,2, Han Meng3, Lifeng Yu3
1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Xuhui District 200233, Shanghai, China.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
|June 23, 2026
Summary
Ponticulus posticus (POPO) can complicate C1 pedicle screw (CPS) placement. A CTA-based workflow using D3 and D5 thresholds can identify suitable POPO anatomies for CPS, but clinical validation is needed.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Radiology
- Orthopedic Surgery
Background:
- Ponticulus posticus (POPO) may distort C1 anatomy, increasing risk of vertebral artery compromise (VAC) during C1 pedicle screw (CPS) placement.
- A reliable workflow is needed to identify POPO anatomies suitable for safe CPS placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based workflow to identify POPO anatomies potentially suitable for CPS placement.
- To evaluate the feasibility and safety of simulated CPS placement in patients with and without POPO.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective CTA simulation study of 141 subjects (46 bilateral POPO, 65 unilateral POPO, 30 non-POPO).
- Simulated CPS trajectories using PedicleScrewSimulator, analyzing morphometric parameters including D3 and D5.
- Evaluated simulated CPS feasibility and VAC for various screw diameters (2.5-4.0 mm).
Main Results:
- Significant differences in D1 and D1-D2 shift among groups; D5 was smaller in bilateral POPO patients.
- Overall simulated CPS feasibility was 96.0% for 3.5 mm screws.
- POPO sides had 93.5% feasibility and 6.5% VAC, versus 99.2% and 0.8% in regular sides.
- An exploratory D3/D5 rule (D3 ≥ 3.4 mm and D5 ≥ 2.0 mm) showed 100% specificity for avoiding simulated 3.5-mm VAC.
Conclusions:
- CTA-based D3 and D5 thresholds can identify POPO anatomies suitable for CPS placement.
- The D3/D5 rule may serve as a conservative screening tool for CPS placement in POPO.
- POPO should not preclude CPS consideration but warrants careful CTA analysis and conservative screw selection.

