Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration
10:53

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration

Published on: October 13, 2019

Volume and surface methods for microparticle traction force microscopy: a computational and experimental comparison.

Simon Brauburger1,2,3, Bastian K Kraus1,2, Tobias Walther4

  • 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.

Soft Matter
|June 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DNA origami snaps into place.

Science robotics·2026
Same author

Label Type Influence on DNA Translocation Velocity in Solid-State Nanopores.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Mechanically Programmable DNA Hydrogel Microparticles for 3D Cellular Systems.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Membrane-Spanning Nanopores Formed from Nucleic Acids.

Chemical reviews·2026
Same author

Dynamic switching of cell-substrate contact sites allows gliding diatoms to modulate the curvature of their paths.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Growth, Dissolution and Segregation of Genetically Encoded RNA Droplets by Ribozyme Catalysis.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same journal

Correction: Effect of external salt solution concentration on carboxyl dissociation degree (<i>α</i>) and p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of weak polyelectrolyte membranes for sustainable technologies.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Anomalous dewetting dynamics in active entangled polymer films: flexible chains.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Electrorheology of the suspensions of oblate poly(ionic liquid) ellipsoids.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Nanopore sequencing with proteins: synchronization and dischronization of molecular dynamics simulations with laboratory and industrial developments.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Catanionics from biosurfactants and regular surfactants: miscibility and structure.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Adhesives with a thickness smaller than the fractocohesive length enhance adhesion.

Soft matter·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing two microparticle traction force microscopy methods, the surface method shows lower errors than the volume method for measuring cellular forces. This study validates the surface method using DNA hydrogel microparticles and simulations.

Area of Science:

  • Mechanobiology
  • Biophysics
  • Cellular mechanics

Background:

  • Measuring cellular forces is crucial in mechanobiology.
  • Microparticle traction force microscopy (MTFM) infers cell forces from microparticle deformation.
  • Two MTFM variants exist: volume and surface methods, lacking direct comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare the accuracy and performance of the volume and surface methods in MTFM.
  • To validate findings using both simulated data and experimental measurements.
  • To introduce novel DNA-based hydrogel microparticles for MTFM.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative comparison of volume and surface methods using simulated traction fields.
  • Development of DNA-based hydrogel microparticles with surface and embedded fluorescent labels.

More Related Videos

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy
09:26

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy

Published on: February 17, 2022

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation
09:28

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation

Published on: July 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration
10:53

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration

Published on: October 13, 2019

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy
09:26

Pattern Generation for Micropattern Traction Microscopy

Published on: February 17, 2022

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation
09:28

Traction Force Microscopy to Study B Lymphocyte Activation

Published on: July 23, 2020

  • Experimental validation through compression tests and analysis of traction profiles.

    • Main Results:

    • The surface method demonstrated significantly lower reconstruction errors for traction profiles compared to the volume method.
    • Performance differences diminished at higher noise levels.
    • Experimental results with DNA microparticles aligned with simulations and Hertzian contact mechanics.

    Conclusions:

    • The surface method is more accurate for reconstructing cellular traction forces than the volume method.
    • DNA-based hydrogel microparticles are effective and biocompatible tools for cellular force measurements.
    • Linear elasticity theory remains valid for large experimental deformations (up to 20%).