Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of the gene cluster for the dithiolopyrrolone antibiotic holomycin in Streptomyces clavuligerus.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2010
Same author

Safety evaluation of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) flower extract: assessment of mutagenicity, and acute and subchronic toxicity in rats.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2010
Same author

Influences of soil properties and leaching on nickel toxicity to barley root elongation.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2010
Same author

Effects of CO2 insufflation on cerebrum during endoscopic thyroidectomy in a porcine model.

Surgical endoscopy·2010
Same author

Plants' use of different nitrogen forms in response to crude oil contamination.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2010
Same author

Overexpression of p35 in Min6 pancreatic beta cells induces a stressed neuron-like apoptosis.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2010

Related Experiment Videos

RoCA: Robust Contrastive One-Class Time Series Anomaly Detection With Contaminated Data.

Xudong Mou, Rui Wang, Bo Li

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |June 23, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary

    RoCA enhances time series anomaly detection (TSAD) by using multiple normality assumptions to overcome limitations of single assumptions and contaminated data. This robust framework improves accuracy, especially in real-world scenarios.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Data Science
    • Signal Processing

    Background:

    • Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) is crucial due to increasing data volumes and label scarcity.
    • Existing methods struggle with incomplete normality assumptions and data contamination, limiting robustness.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose RoCA, a unified and robust framework for TSAD that addresses assumption incompleteness and data contamination.
    • To develop a method that does not rely on clean training data.

    Main Methods:

    • RoCA employs a composite loss function with multinormality alignment, dynamic anomaly awareness, and variance terms.
    • It leverages the insight that normal samples satisfy multiple assumptions, while anomalies violate at least one.
    • The framework dynamically identifies and excludes anomalies during training to refine detection boundaries.

    Main Results:

    • RoCA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods on univariate and multivariate time series datasets.
    • Achieved up to 7.3% improvement under real-world data contamination.
    • Demonstrated the synergy between contrastive learning (CL) and one-class classification (OC) within the RoCA framework.

    Conclusions:

    • RoCA offers a robust and effective solution for TSAD, overcoming key limitations of existing approaches.
    • The framework's ability to handle contaminated data and incomplete assumptions makes it suitable for real-world applications.
    • RoCA provides a unified approach, enhancing both theoretical understanding and practical performance in anomaly detection.