New Modalities and Carcinogenicity Assessment

Emily K Meseck1, Paul Batty2, Tae-Won Kim3

  • 1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.

Toxicologic Pathology
|June 23, 2026
PubMed

Insights

New gene therapies like AAV and CAR-T cell therapies need better carcinogenicity risk assessments. A case study explored using rat mammary gland cell proliferation to evaluate insulin

Area of Science:

  • Drug development
  • Toxicology
  • Gene therapy

Background:

  • Emerging drug modalities like adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy, targeted protein degraders, oligonucleotides, and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapies present challenges for human carcinogenicity risk assessment.
  • Traditional methods such as genetic toxicology and rodent bioassays may require updates to adequately assess these novel therapeutic agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss updated strategies and contexts for human carcinogenicity risk assessment of emerging drug development modalities.
  • To present a real-world case study evaluating the utility of rat mammary gland cell proliferation as a biomarker for carcinogenic potential.

Main Methods:

  • Review of emerging drug development modalities and their implications for carcinogenicity risk assessment.
  • Analysis of a case study investigating the carcinogenic potential of exogenous insulin.
  • Interrogation of rat mammary gland cell proliferation as a predictive tool for carcinogenicity.

Main Results:

  • Emerging therapies necessitate a re-evaluation of standard carcinogenicity assessment approaches.
  • The case study provided insights into the applicability of specific mechanistic biomarkers.

Conclusions:

  • Updated strategies are crucial for the accurate human carcinogenicity risk assessment of novel therapeutics.
  • Mechanistic approaches, such as evaluating cell proliferation, may offer valuable adjuncts to traditional methods.