Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Developing a patient decision aid for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A mixed-methods study
Fadi H Yonan1, David B Anderson2, Daniel I Rhon3
1School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Background:
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS) is a prominent source of non-arthritic hip pain and is highly prevalent in young active populations. Decisions to undergo surgery are significant in nature and require proper understanding of potential benefits and risks.
Objective:
To develop and user-test a patient decision aid comparing non-surgical management and hip arthroscopy for FAIS with an additional military-related section.
Design:
Mixed-methods.
Method:
The initial draft of the decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group. An iterative process of semi-structured interviews, re-drafting and further interviews provided feedback on the decision aid. The interviews were analysed reflexively using thematic analysis for qualitative findings. Acceptability questionnaires were analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative findings.
Results:
We interviewed 27-participants; 13 clinicians (6 physiotherapists, 3 orthopaedic surgeons, 2 general practitioners, 1 sports medicine doctor, 1 anaesthesia pain physician) and 14 patients. Most participants rated the decision aid's acceptability as good-to-excellent. Participants agreed on most aspects of the decision aid including the introduction, treatment options, comparison of outcomes and questions to consider asking a health professional. Participants agreed on including more information on the treatment options and provide more long-term outcomes comparing the options. Our decision aid met all 6 of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards qualifying criteria.
Conclusion:
Our decision aid was considered a useful tool that may help patients choose an appropriate treatment option for the management of FAIS. A clinical trial evaluating the impact of the decision aid on decision making for patients considering surgery for FAIS is needed.
