Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A 3D Organotypic Melanoma Spheroid Skin Model
Published on: May 18, 2018
Response and survival in unresectable in-transit metastatic melanoma according to treatment strategy
Cato Boreel1, Jessie de Ruijter2, Olivier van Not3
1Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, the Netherlands.
Background:
Currently, no comprehensive overview exists of response and survival outcomes for first-line immune checkpoint inhibition, BRAF/BRAF + MEK inhibition (BRAF(/MEK)i), and talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients with unresectable in-transit metastases (ITM). This study aims to provide a real-world overview of these outcomes.
Methods:
Using data from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry, all patients receiving systemic treatment from 2012 to July 2025 for unresectable ITM, with or without lymph node metastases (LNM) (stage III-IVM1a), were analysed for overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). A multivariable Cox model adjusted for age, sex, ECOG PS, LDH, and LNM.
Results:
In total, 530 patients were identified: 213 received first-line anti-PD1, 182 T-VEC, 67 BRAF(/MEK)i, 37 ipilimumab (IPI), and 31 ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI+NIVO). Patients receiving T-VEC had more favorable baseline characteristics, including less often stage IV disease, less often LNM, and lower LDH. ORR were comparable between treatments: anti-PD1 53.1%, T-VEC 52.2%, BRAF(/MEK)i 62.7%. Median PFS was significantly shorter for T-VEC (5.6months; 95%CI 4.2-8.1) than for anti-PD1 (8.1months; 95%CI 5.9-13.8) and BRAF(/MEK)i (9.2months; 95%CI 6.9-14.3). Median OS favored T-VEC (not reached (NR); 95%CI 61.5-NR) over anti-PD1 (37.2months; 95%CI 32.3-64.7) and BRAF(/MEK)i (24.7months; 95%CI 18.0-62.1), but this difference between T-VEC and anti-PD1 disappeared after adjusting for confounders and no differences were observed in MSS. In the ITM-only subgroup, T-VEC-treated patients demonstrated longer observed OS than anti-PD1 and BRAF(/MEK)i, while in patients with ITM and LNM, anti-PD1 showed longer PFS but similar OS compared with T-VEC.
Conclusions:
For ITM unresectable melanoma, first-line anti-PD1, T-VEC, and BRAF(/MEK)i can induce clinically meaningful and durable responses. The optimal treatment choice depends on patient and disease characteristics and preferences.
Insights
First-line treatments like anti-PD1, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), and BRAF/BRAF+MEK inhibition show comparable response rates for unresectable melanoma with in-transit metastases (ITM). Treatment choice depends on individual patient and disease factors for optimal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Melanoma Research
Background:
- Limited real-world data exists for first-line treatments in unresectable in-transit melanoma (ITM).
- Key treatments include immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1), BRAF/BRAF+MEK inhibition (BRAF(/MEK)i), and talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC).
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of response and survival outcomes for first-line systemic therapies in unresectable ITM patients.
- To compare the efficacy of anti-PD1, T-VEC, and BRAF(/MEK)i in a real-world setting.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (2012-2025).
- Inclusion of patients with unresectable ITM (stage III-IVM1a), with or without lymph node metastases (LNM).
- Evaluation of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) using multivariable Cox models.
Main Results:
- 530 patients received first-line anti-PD1 (n=213), T-VEC (n=182), BRAF(/MEK)i (n=67), ipilimumab (n=37), or ipilimumab+nivolumab (n=31).
- ORR was comparable across anti-PD1 (53.1%), T-VEC (52.2%), and BRAF(/MEK)i (62.7%).
- Median PFS was shorter for T-VEC (5.6 months) versus anti-PD1 (8.1 months) and BRAF(/MEK)i (9.2 months). Median OS favored T-VEC (NR) over anti-PD1 (37.2 months) and BRAF(/MEK)i (24.7 months), but differences diminished after adjusting for confounders.
Conclusions:
- First-line anti-PD1, T-VEC, and BRAF(/MEK)i offer clinically meaningful and durable responses in unresectable ITM melanoma.
- Optimal treatment selection requires consideration of patient-specific and disease characteristics.
- Real-world data supports the efficacy of these novel therapies in advanced melanoma.
Related Concept Videos
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Metastasis
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or EMT is a developmental process commonly observed in wound healing, embryogenesis, and cancer metastasis. EMT is induced by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligands, which further...

