Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Preclinical Model of Prenatal Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure to Assess Its Impact on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
Published on: February 28, 2025
Social vulnerability and prenatal cannabis safety messaging from cannabis retailers in California
Kelly C Young-Wolff1, Bethany J Simard2, Monique B Does3
1Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Background:
Prenatal cannabis use is increasing, and pregnant individuals often seek guidance from cannabis retailers. It is unknown whether budtender messaging varies by community social vulnerability.
Methods:
This cross-sectional mystery shopper study included 505 randomly selected California licensed cannabis retailers (2/26/2024-1/28/2025). Social vulnerability within a 15-minute drive-time buffer around retailers was measured by the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI; range 0-1; four domains: socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial/ethnic minority status, housing/transportation). The primary outcome was a 4-category prenatal cannabis risk communication measure: clear risk messaging [reference], mode-specific lower-risk messaging, no clear safety/risk messaging, and safety-affirming messaging. Secondary outcomes included product recommendations, fetal or infant health risks, information sources, and guidance to consult a clinician. Logistic and multinomial logistic regression models assessed associations between SVI and outcomes; SVI was multiplied by 10, so estimates reflect odds associated with a 0.1 increase in SVI.
Results:
Greater household vulnerability was associated with safety-affirming messaging (OR=1.26;95%CI:1.01-1.56) and no clear safety/risk messaging (OR=1.25; 95%CI:1.05-1.50) versus clear risk messaging. Greater racial/ethnic minority vulnerability was associated with safety-affirming versus clear risk messaging (OR=1.21; 95%CI:1.00-1.47). Greater housing/transportation vulnerability was associated with mode-specific lower-risk messaging versus clear risk messaging (OR=1.42; 95%CI:1.06-1.91). Citing warnings was more common in areas with greater socioeconomic vulnerability (OR=1.23; 95%CI:1.01-1.51). Other outcomes did not differ by SVI.
Conclusions:
Budtenders in more vulnerable areas were more likely to provide safety-affirming, mode-specific lower-risk, or no clear safety/risk messaging rather than clear prenatal cannabis risk messaging. Findings highlight the need for consistent, evidence-based communication in retail settings.
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Teratogenicity
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Hallucinogens and Psychedelics
Marijuana, derived from the dried leaves and flowers of the hemp plant, contains delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Regulation
