Related Experiment Videos
DOAC score among patients receiving Vitamin K antagonists
Rahul Aggarwal1, Christian T Ruff2, Michael G Palazzolo2
1Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Insights
The DOAC Score effectively stratifies bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation patients on vitamin K antagonists, outperforming the HAS-BLED score. This bleeding risk assessment tool aids in managing anticoagulation therapy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Risk Stratification
Background:
- The DOAC Score is a validated bleeding risk assessment tool for patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
- Existing scores like HAS-BLED have limitations in specific patient populations.
- This study investigates the DOAC Score's utility in patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the discriminative performance of the DOAC Score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with VKAs.
- To compare the DOAC Score's effectiveness against the HAS-BLED score in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the COMBINE-AF and GARFIELD-AF studies, including patients on VKAs.
- Calculated DOAC Scores and stratified patients into risk categories.
- Assessed one-year major bleeding rates and discrimination using C-statistics, comparing DOAC Score with HAS-BLED.
Main Results:
- Included over 49,000 patients on VKAs across both cohorts.
- Higher DOAC Score categories correlated with increased one-year major bleeding rates in both COMBINE-AF and GARFIELD-AF.
- The DOAC Score demonstrated moderate discrimination, outperforming HAS-BLED in both studies (C-statistics: 0.62 vs 0.59 in COMBINE-AF; 0.65 vs 0.62 in GARFIELD-AF).
Conclusions:
- The DOAC Score effectively stratifies bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation patients on VKAs.
- The DOAC Score exhibits moderate discriminative ability and superior performance compared to HAS-BLED in this population.
- This suggests the DOAC Score is a valuable tool for managing bleeding risk in VKA-treated AF patients.
Background:
The direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) score is a bleeding risk score that incorporates 10 common clinical variables to risk stratify major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and demonstrated improved risk stratification compared with HAS-BLED in patients receiving DOACs. This study evaluates the discriminative performance of the DOAC score among patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
Methods:
Data were obtained from COMBINE-AF and GARFIELD-AF. COMBINE-AF included patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to warfarin from 4 clinical trials: RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. GARFIELD-AF included patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed VKAs in a registry. The DOAC score of each patient was determined, based on commonly obtained clinical variables. Patients were then stratified by DOAC score clinical risk categories (very low [score: 0-3], low [score: 4-5], moderate [score: 6-7], high [score: 8-9], and very high [score: 10]), and the rate of major bleeding at 1 year was compared between groups. Discrimination was assessed using C-statistics and compared with HAS-BLED using DeLong's test.
Results:
A total of 28,818 patients in COMBINE-AF and 20,183 patients in GARFIELD-AF receiving vitamin K antagonists were included. Of these individuals, 994 (3.4%) in COMBINE-AF and 313 (1.6%) in GARFIELD-AF experienced a major bleeding event at 1 year. Patients in higher DOAC score risk categories experienced greater 1-year major bleeding rates in COMBINE-AF, including very low (1.8 events per 100 person-years [events/100p-y]), low (3.0 events/100 p-y), moderate (4.6 events/100 p-y), high (5.6 events/100 p-y), and very high (7.9 events/100 p-y). Discrimination in COMBINE-AF was moderate and higher than HAS-BLED at 1 year (C-statistic: 0.62 vs 0.59, P < .001). In GARFIELD-AF, higher risk categories also had higher 1-year major bleeding rates: very low (0.8 events per 100 person-years [events/100 p-y]), low (1.5 events/100 p-y), moderate (2.2 events/100 p-y), high (3.2 events/100 p-y), and very high (7.6 events/100 p-y). Discrimination in GARFIELD-AF was moderate and higher than the HAS-BLED score at 1 year (C-statistic: 0.65 vs 0.62, P < .001).
Conclusion:
In patients with atrial fibrillation taking VKAs, the DOAC score was able to risk stratify patients based on bleeding risk, had moderate discrimination, and out-performed the HAS-BLED score in both a pooled clinical trials cohort and a usual care registry.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures