Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026
Using Simulation Models to Train Clinicians in the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound
Published on: August 9, 2024
Program signaling in the integrated interventional radiology residency match: A cross-sectional survey of program
Neil K Jain1, Pasha Pourebrahim2, Hwa-Pyung Lim1
1Division of Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA; Division of Interventional Radiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Purpose:
To characterize integrated interventional radiology (IR) residency program directors' perceptions of the program signaling system during the 2022-2023 application cycle.
Materials And Methods:
A 29-item electronic survey was distributed to all 94 integrated IR program directors in the United States shortly after the 2023 Match. The survey assessed program demographics, signal volume, and how program directors perceived and utilized signals in the application review, interview selection, and ranking processes. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
Results:
Thirty-two program directors responded (32% response rate), of whom 30 reported participating in program signaling during the 2022-2023 cycle. Most (83%) reported receiving at least one signal, with a median of 12 signals per program (IQR 7-20). Two-thirds (67%) reported that signals influenced their decision to offer an interview, while only 33% considered signals when formulating their rank list. Over half (53%) believed signaling was beneficial for applicants. The interpretation of signal value varied across programs and was often weighed alongside other factors, such as away rotations or institutional affiliation.
Conclusion:
Program directors viewed signaling as modestly useful during interview selection but less influential in final ranking. These findings provide a preliminary understanding of how IR programs integrated signaling into their selection processes during the early implementation phase.
