Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation
Published on: October 15, 2021
Comparable outcomes for non-operative intracranial hemorrhage at Level III vs Level I/II trauma centers
Spencer Lord1, Yasmin Arda1, Ioannis Karikis1
1Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Introduction:
Most patients with isolated, closed blunt intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) do not require neurosurgical intervention. However, outcome data for those managed entirely at Level III trauma centers remain incompletely characterized.
Methods:
Using the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP), we compared clinical outcomes for non-operative ICH patients treated at Level I/II versus Level III trauma centers. The primary endpoint was composite in-hospital adverse event counts per patient, modeled using negative binomial regression and reported as adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs). Secondary analyses included patients with ISS > 15, ICU admission by trauma center level, predictors of ICU admission, and unplanned ICU transfers. To address triage selection bias, we also compared time to ED discharge in a cohort of patients who met the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and were transferred from a Level III trauma center.
Results:
A total of 24,132 patients were included after complete-case exclusion (Level I/II: 22,846; Level III: 1286). Composite adverse event counts were 0.067 events per patient at Level I/II centers and 0.042 at Level III centers. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant difference in composite adverse event counts between groups (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.56-1.18). Mortality was lower at Level III centers (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.35). Composite adverse event count outcomes were similar in the ISS > 15 subgroup (aIRR 0.65, 95% CI 0.35-1.11). Among ICU admissions, the association between ICU admission and composite adverse event counts differed by trauma center level, with a lower relative effect of ICU admission at Level III centers compared to Level I/II centers (interaction aIRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.92). Exploratory analysis showed, after adjustment, significant factors associated with ICU admission were midline shift < 5 mm (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29-1.61), lower GCS (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.86), alcohol use disorder (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.22-1.62), and anticoagulant use (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.59). Significant unplanned ICU admission included alcohol use disorder (aOR 5.04, 95% CI 2.74-8.90) and anticoagulation use (aOR 3.38, 95% CI 1.94-5.72). Following ED arrival, 94.2% of patients at Level III centers were admitted within 6 h, and 97.9% of transferred patients were transferred within 6 h (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.30-3.90).
Conclusion:
Selected patients with non-operative ICH can be managed at Level III trauma centers without increased complications or the need for neurosurgical intervention.
