Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
Published on: August 12, 2018
Improved Radiofrequency Safety Modelling in MRI Using In Vivo Measurements of Brain Conductivity
Guillaume Paillart1, Zhongzheng He1,2, Grecia Romero3
1IADI (U1254), Université de Lorraine and Inserm, Nancy, France.
None:
Tissue electrical properties are required by electromagnetic simulation software to conduct radiofrequency (RF) safety studies. Values are commonly taken from existing databases of tissue properties, where brain conductivity was measured ex vivo. We hypothesize that using in vivo brain conductivity values, as reported in the recent literature on in vivo MRI measurements, can improve the accuracy of such simulations. Sixteen subjects were scanned at 3T to obtain experimental maps of the transmit RF field, , of the head. Electromagnetic simulations were performed using biomodels with varying morphologies, using both a conventional ( ) and a modified brain conductivity ( ). A framework was developed to process the simulated fields, including a systematic method to combine the two excitation ports of the transmit coil model (accounting for different load impedances between simulation and experiment), geometric alignment, and scaling of the simulated fields, allowing a quantitative comparison of complex maps of the brain with experimental maps. Specific absorption rate (SAR) maps were also estimated by different methods, including a novel -derived formula. Normalized root-mean-squared errors between simulation and experiment, in the brain, were approximately 6% for magnitude. While head geometry mainly impacted the accuracy of magnitude, with errors up to 11% (p = 0.007) between the best fitting human model and the worst one, brain electrical conductivity mainly impacted phase, with errors reduced by 48% when using instead of (p = 0.0004). The agreement in average brain SAR, between simulation and experiment, was also improved, with differences reduced from 62% ( ) to 22% ( ). Using brain conductivity values from recent in vivo studies improves the accuracy of RF safety modelling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04645628.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
