Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Disease Complexity and Nodule-Specific Responses to Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular
Sae Yumita1, Sadahisa Ogasawara1, Makoto Fujiya1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Background:
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a range of presentations and responses to immunotherapy. We sought to determine the effects of Atez/Bev in patients with advanced HCC and various prognostic factors.
Methods:
We analyzed 183 patients with advanced HCC who received Atez/Bev and targeted the response patterns of 517 intrahepatic tumors and 88 extrahepatic tumors, organized by poor prognostic indicators: extrahepatic metastasis (EHM), microvascular invasion (MVI), and large intrahepatic tumors (≥5 cm).
Results:
The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded at 8.0 months and 22.6 months, respectively, with an objective response rate of 19.7%. Response patterns differed significantly for large intrahepatic tumors (≥5 cm): these tumors progressed more slowly than smaller tumors, accompanied by a similar incidence of new lesions and target lesion progression. The correlation between PFS and OS varied notably between patients with large tumors and those without, with correlation coefficients of 0.662 (95% CI: 0.559-0.764) and 0.475 (95% CI: 0.326-0.624), respectively. Intrahepatic lesions displayed homogenous responses (correlation coefficient = 0.682), while the correlation between intrahepatic and extrahepatic responses was weaker (correlation coefficient = 0.474). Tumors with MVI varied their response patterns according to their associated vascular invasion, although MVI did not influence survival. EHM affected PFS and OS, while tumor size only influenced OS.
Conclusions:
Large intrahepatic tumors treated with Atez/Bev demonstrate prolonged stability, incomplete responses, and worse survival. The differing correlations between PFS and OS based on tumor size have significant implications for the design of clinical trials. This may indicate a potential advantage in incorporating locoregional interventions for treating large tumors in HCC strategies.
More Related Videos
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
06:15Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers