Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring a Case of Unconjugated Hyperbilirubinaemia Resulting from the Rare Coexistence of Inherited Disorders- A Case Report.

Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB·2026
Same author

Isolation and Characterization of Cross-Neutralizing Human Anti-V3 Single-Chain Variable Fragments (scFvs) Against HIV-1 from an Antigen Preselected Phage Library.

Applied biochemistry and biotechnology·2018
Same author

Serodiagnostic evaluation of recombinant CdtB of S. Typhi as a potential candidate for acute typhoid.

Immunologic research·2018
Same author

Inhibition of preS1-hepatocyte interaction by an array of recombinant human antibodies from naturally recovered individuals.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

A repertoire of high-affinity monoclonal antibodies specific to S. typhi: as potential candidate for improved typhoid diagnostic.

Immunologic research·2015
Same author

A novel strategy for efficient production of anti-V3 human scFvs against HIV-1 clade C.

BMC biotechnology·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

Optimizing laboratory quality with sigma metrics: Application of CLIA 2024 total allowable error guidelines.

Anurag Sankhyan1, Onjal Kamlakar Taywade1,2, Sumita Sharma1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, AIIMS Bilaspur, Bilaspur, India.

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
|June 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Statistical quality control for laboratory biochemistry parameters was assessed using Six Sigma metrics against new CLIA 2024 guidelines. Some tests met standards, but many require improved quality control strategies.

Keywords:
Sigma metricsquality controlquality goalstotal allowable errortotal quality management

More Related Videos

Monochrome Multiplex Quantitative PCR Telomere Length Measurement
11:44

Monochrome Multiplex Quantitative PCR Telomere Length Measurement

Published on: March 22, 2024

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

Monochrome Multiplex Quantitative PCR Telomere Length Measurement
11:44

Monochrome Multiplex Quantitative PCR Telomere Length Measurement

Published on: March 22, 2024

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Quality Management

Background:

  • Statistical quality control is essential for laboratory accuracy and reliability.
  • Revised Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) 2024 guidelines present tighter total allowable error (TEa) goals.
  • Evaluating performance against these new standards is crucial for quality control strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of 20 biochemistry parameters using Six Sigma methodology.
  • To evaluate laboratory performance in light of the CLIA 2024 TEa guidelines.
  • To inform the application of appropriate quality control strategies for clinical laboratories.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Six Sigma methodology to analyze quality control data for 20 biochemistry parameters.
  • Collected internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) data from December 2023 to May 2024.
  • Calculated sigma metrics using coefficient of variation (%), bias (%), and TEa based on CLIA and Ricos biological variation guidelines.

Main Results:

  • Excellent (≥6 sigma) performance was observed for direct bilirubin and HDL-cholesterol.
  • Several parameters (Albumin, glucose, etc.) met the minimum sigma performance standard (>3) at one level.
  • Other chemistry parameters failed to meet the minimum sigma performance standard across all assay ranges.

Conclusions:

  • Laboratories must reassess biochemistry parameter performance under the stricter CLIA 2024 TEa goals.
  • Redefining quality control protocols is necessary to meet the updated error limits.
  • The study highlights areas needing improved quality control strategies to ensure reliable laboratory testing.