Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Risk Factors for Persistent Cranial Defects After Open Cranial Vault Remodeling for Sagittal Synostosis
Jared H Chung1, Emily Dunbar2, Amanda Hendrix2
1University of Virginia School of Medicine.
Background:
Open cranial vault remodeling with craniectomy and barrel-stave osteotomies remains an established treatment for sagittal synostosis. However, predictors of persistent cranial defects requiring secondary cranioplasty remain incompletely defined. Clarifying factors associated with secondary cranioplasty may inform surgical decision-making and postoperative surveillance.
Methods:
A single-center retrospective review of 93 patients undergoing open cranial vault remodeling for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis was performed (2007-2023). Secondary cranioplasty for persistent calvarial defects was the primary outcome. Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing and categorical variables using Fisher exact testing. Predictors of secondary cranioplasty were evaluated using bias-reduced multivariable logistic regression, including procedure time, age, and surgical approach. Time-to-event analyses were performed to account for variable follow-up duration, with a sensitivity analysis in patients with ≥5 years of follow-up.
Results:
Secondary cranioplasty was performed in 8/93 patients (8.6%). No variables were significantly associated with secondary cranioplasty on univariate comparison. Procedure time was associated with secondary cranioplasty in multivariable analysis (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.01-3.06, P=0.046), while age at surgery and bifrontal craniectomy were not significant. Craniectomy width was also not associated with secondary surgery. Time-to-event analyses demonstrated no consistent predictors. In the ≥5-year cohort (n=40), no variables remained significant.
Conclusions:
Secondary cranioplasty occurred in ∼9% of patients. While procedure time was associated with the need for secondary cranioplasty, this finding was not consistent across sensitivity analyses and likely reflects surgical complexity rather than causality. No definitive associations were identified, highlighting the multifactorial nature of postoperative cranial defects.
More Related Videos
04:17The Establishment of Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects in Rats: A Standardized Model for Suture-Regenerative Therapy Investigation
Published on: May 10, 2024
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024