Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Intrathecal Application of a Fluorescent Dye for the Identification of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Cochlear Malformation
Published on: February 29, 2020
Out of the Reading Room: The Case for Patient-Facing Neuroradiology in Spinal CSF Leak Care
1From the Department of Radiology (A.L.C.), Neuroradiology Section, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado and Department of Neurology (A.L.C.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. andrew.callen@cuanschutz.edu.
Background:
The diagnosis of spinal CSF leak rests on tests that are individually imperfect and still evolving. A normal brain MRI does not exclude a leak, spine MRI cannot detect CSF-venous fistulas, and advanced myelography is technique dependent. As a result, a negative study often reflects the limits of the method or its sensitivity rather than the true absence of disease, yet it is frequently communicated to patients and referring clinicians as a definitive answer. A 'classic' orthostatic headache, long treated as the entry criterion for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), captures only part of the disease and may be least reliable in patients with CSF-venous fistulas. These gaps contribute to well-documented diagnostic delays. This article considers how the neuroradiologist's role might extend beyond the signed report to address them.
Methods:
This State of Practice synthesizes current evidence on brain and spinal MRI, dynamic myelographic technique, empiric patching, and the patient diagnostic experience, together with the perspective of a neuroradiology practice subspecialized in spinal CSF leak imaging and treatment.
Key Message:
For selected patients with suspected SIH, the neuroradiologist's role should extend beyond issuing a report. These include patients whose phenotype and imaging disagree, who remain symptomatic despite a "negative" study, or who face escalating procedural choices. In such cases the neuroradiologist is often best positioned to turn imaging uncertainty into a decision through a focused, patient-facing consultation: reconciling phenotype with imaging, auditing whether prior testing matched the suspected leak type, directing the next best step, and weighing the cost of each option with the patient. Its value should be measured against the patient's entire diagnostic odyssey, not a single imaging report. A negative study lowers the probability of a leak; it does not reduce it to zero. Better care may require neuroradiologists to step out of the reading room.
Insights
Diagnosing spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks can be challenging due to imperfect tests. Neuroradiologists should consult directly with patients to clarify uncertain imaging results and guide treatment decisions for better care.
Area of Science:
- Neuroradiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak diagnosis relies on imperfect and evolving tests.
- Brain MRI may not exclude leaks, spine MRI misses CSF-venous fistulas, and myelography is technique-dependent.
- A "classic" orthostatic headache is an unreliable sole criterion for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH).
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore extending the neuroradiologist's role beyond traditional reporting in spinal CSF leak diagnosis.
- To address diagnostic delays caused by limitations in current imaging and diagnostic criteria.
- To improve patient care by integrating imaging findings with clinical presentation.
Main Methods:
- Synthesis of current evidence on MRI, myelography, and empiric patching.
- Incorporation of the patient diagnostic experience.
- Perspective from a neuroradiology practice specializing in spinal CSF leak imaging and treatment.
Main Results:
- Negative imaging studies do not definitively exclude a spinal CSF leak.
- Discrepancies between patient phenotype and imaging require further investigation.
- Neuroradiologists are well-positioned to guide decision-making in complex cases.
Conclusions:
- For suspected SIH, neuroradiologists should engage in patient-facing consultations.
- These consultations should reconcile imaging with clinical presentation and guide next steps.
- The value of diagnostic imaging should be assessed within the context of the patient's entire diagnostic journey.
More Related Videos
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
14:59Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022