Occupational radiation exposure and radiation protection practices in interventional radiology and cardiology: A
Cyril Duverger1, Djamel Dabli1, Jean-Paul Beregi1
1IMAGINE UR UM 103, Montpellier University, Department of Medical Imaging, Nîmes University Hospital, 30029 Nîmes, France.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to assess occupational radiation exposure and radiation protection practices among physicians performing interventional radiology and cardiology procedures in France.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective multicenter study included 138 radiologists and 106 cardiologists from 17 French centers between 2019 and 2021. Data regarding passive dosimetry monitoring, radiation protection training, and availability and use of collective and personal protective equipment were collected. Whole-body, extremity, and eye lens dosimetry results were analyzed according to specialty and activity. Only physicians reporting systematic or frequent dosimeter use were included in the quantitative dosimetry analysis.
Results:
Whole-body dosimeters were available for all physicians, whereas extremity and eye lens dosimeters were less often available, particularly in radiology (67% and 27%, respectively). Systematic or frequent dosimeter use was lower for extremity and eye lens monitoring than for whole-body monitoring. Median annual whole-body effective doses remained low in both radiology and cardiology (0.36 and 0.61 mSv/year, respectively), and no physician exceeded the 6 mSv/year threshold corresponding to category B workers. Extremity and eye lens exposures were substantially higher, particularly in vascular radiology and coronary/valvular cardiology. Four out of 244 physicians (1.6%) exceeded the annual eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv/year. Despite broad availability of eye protection equipment, non-use remained frequent among radiologists (35%). Radiation protection training remained heterogeneous across specialties and activities.
Conclusion:
Occupational radiation exposure remained globally low for whole-body exposure but remained substantial for extremities and especially the eye lens. Persistent shortcomings in dosimeter compliance and eye protection use emphasize the need to reinforce radiation protection practices in high-exposure interventional specialties.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:13Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
02:59Biological Effects of Radiation