Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
Published on: February 15, 2015
Moral flexibility without mutual benefits: From change to disagreement
1Department of Philosophy at Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China fu.philosophy@gmail.com myfnene@gmail.com.
None:
Resource-rational contractualism claims that moral flexibility leads to mutually beneficial agreements through renegotiation when new situations arise. We challenge this view using COVID-19 evidence, where moral change leads to persistent disagreement rather than consensus. We demonstrate that three psychological factors - social identity, confirmation bias, and emotional responses - systematically prevent convergence, revealing limitations in the resource-rational contractualism model.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Relationship Growth
Motivational Bias
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Egoism and Altruism
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
