Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment
Rocío Lavigne-Cerván1, Joshua Collado-Valero1, Ignasi Navarro-Soria2
1Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Málaga, 29004 Málaga, Spain.
Background:
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impairments in working memory (WM) and processing speed (PS). Previous studies using earlier editions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) have identified a cognitive response pattern defined by lower Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI). However, evidence using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition (WISC-V) remains limited. This study aimed to examine whether the WISC-V identifies a characteristic cognitive profile in ADHD and to evaluate its discriminative capacity.
Methods:
The sample consisted of 188 participants aged 6-16 years, including a control group (n = 56) and two clinical ADHD groups: The combined presentation of ADHD (ADHD-C; n = 57) and the predominantly inattentive presentation of ADHD (ADHD-I; n = 75). Cognitive functioning was assessed using the WISC-V. Group differences were examined using Multivariate and Univariate Analyses of Covariance (MANCOVA/ANCOVA). Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the predictive capacity of WISC-V.
Results:
Compared with controls, the clinical ADHD group showed significant multivariate differences. Univariate analyses revealed significantly lower performance in the working memory index (WMI; p < 0.001), processing speed index (PSI; p < 0.001), CPI (p < 0.001), and Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ; p = 0.005), in the clinical ADHD group. Differences between ADHD-C and ADHD-I were observed, with the ADHD-I group showing lower scores in WMI (p = 0.016), PSI (p < 0.001), CPI (p < 0.001), and FSIQ (p = 0.016). Logistic regression analyses indicated that WMI (B = -0.067; p < 0.001), PSI (B = -0.043; p = 0.007), and CPI (B = -0.091; p < 0.001) significantly predicted control versus clinical ADHD group membership. When comparing ADHD presentations, PSI (B = -0.055; p = 0.001) and CPI (B = -0.063; p < 0.001) emerged as significant predictors.
Conclusions:
The findings support the use of the WISC-V as a complementary tool in the diagnostic assessment of ADHD.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Working Memory
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Information Processing Approach
Intellectual Disability

