Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Socioeconomic disparities in site-specific cancer incidence and mortality: Golestan cohort study
Mahdokht Naghash1, Nogol Motamed-Gorji1, Nazgol Motamed-Gorji1
1Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).
Introduction:
Socioeconomic inequalities are key contributors to cancer disparities. We explored the associations between individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) indicators (composite wealth score, educational attainment and rural/urban residence) and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality.
Methods:
For this prospective study, we used data from 49 776 participants of the Golestan Cohort Study in northeastern Iran, enrolled in 2004-2008. Follow-up continued until first primary cancer diagnosis, death, loss to follow-up, or 31 March 2021. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate HRs and 95% CI, adjusted for several cancer risk factors and all SES indicators.
Results:
Over a 14-year median follow-up, the highest wealth score quartile, compared with the lowest, was associated with reduced oesophageal (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.88) and gastric (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.86) but elevated breast (HR=2.54; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.89) cancer incidence. The highest education level, compared with none, was associated with reduced oesophageal (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.79), gastric (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84), hepatobiliary (HR=0.33; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83) and lung (HR=0.44; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.00) cancer incidence. Urban residence was associated with decreased oesophageal (HR=0.63; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.90) but increased colorectal (HR=1.72; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.54), breast (HR=2.37; 95% CI 1.52 to 3.71), hepatobiliary (HR=1.70; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.87) and prostate (HR=2.60; 95% CI 1.24 to 5.45) cancer incidence. Cancer mortality analyses showed similar associations though a few results were not statistically significant due to small sample sizes.
Conclusions:
Low wealth score, lack of formal education and rural residence were associated with disparate cancer incidence and mortality, particularly gastrointestinal cancers, in this predominantly rural population from a low- and middle-income country.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...