Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Botulinum toxin treatment for multiple sclerosis and post-stroke spasticity in clinical practice: differences in
Paolo Manganotti1,2, Alessandro Dinoto1, Giulia Mazzon2
1Neurology Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Introduction:
Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) is a safe and effective treatment for spasticity in both multiple sclerosis (MS) and post-stroke spasticity (PSS). This single-center retrospective study compared injection patterns and dosages between these two conditions.
Methods:
Thirty-three people with MS (PwMS) and 55 people with PSS treated with BoNT-A at our outpatient spasticity clinic were analyzed. Clinical and demographic data, BoNT-A dosages, upper- and lower-limb dosing, patterns of injected muscles, and their respective dosages were collected. BoNT-A treatment doses and injection patterns were compared between groups. Patient-reported benefit was also recorded.
Results:
PwMS more frequently received treatment in lower limbs and lower total doses of BoNT-A. Patients with PSS were more commonly treated in distal upper-limb muscles. In the lower limbs, PwMS were more frequently treated in the adductor muscles and rectus femoris, while patients with PSS were more often treated in tibialis posterior. In MS, higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were associated higher total BoNT-A dosage.
Discussion:
MS-related spasticity mainly affects the lower limbs and less frequently upper limbs, and requires lower BoNT-A dosages compared with PSS. In contrast, PSS is characterized by more prominent distal spasticity, particularly in the upper limbs. Treatment patterns and BoNT-A dosing are influenced by these differences in spasticity distribution. We hypothesize that the need to preserve residual motor function, particularly in lower limbs, may have contributed to lower BoNT-A doses in MS, although not systematically investigated. Despite being only marginally assessed, treatment efficacy appeared to be similar in both groups.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Botulism
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which leads...
