Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Published on: February 16, 2024
Risk of Guideline Overselling and Certainty Inflation in GPT-5 Responses: A Statement-Based Analysis of Four ESGE
Marcello Maida1,2, Antonio Facciorusso3, Lorenzo Fuccio4
1Department of Medicine and SurgeryKore University of EnnaEnnaSicilyItaly.
Abstract:
Introduction Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for clinical decision support and show high adherence to clinical practice guidelines. However, LLM-generated responses may translate guideline recommendations into definitive clinical advice without adequately reflecting the underlying strength of recommendations or the quality of supporting evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of guideline overselling in GPT-generated responses based on guidelines. Methods Four ESGE colorectal guidelines were selected. All guideline statements were extracted together with their strength of recommendation and the quality of evidence. For each statement, a clinical vignette and related question were submitted to GPT-5 using both generic and guideline-oriented prompts. Three independent experts assessed each response for adherence to guideline content and calibration of wording. Results Overall, GPT-generated responses showed high adherence to guideline content with generic prompts (54/59, 91.5%), whereas calibration to recommendation strength and evidence quality was lower (44/59, 74.6%). Calibration was significantly reduced for weak versus strong recommendations (33.3% vs. 86.4%, P < 0.001) and for statements supported by low-quality versus high- or moderate-quality evidence (44.4% vs. 90.2%, P < 0.001). After prompt calibration experiment, adherence increased to 96.6% (57/59), while calibration markedly improved to 94.9% (56/59), mainly through reduced overly assertive wording for low-certainty recommendations. Conclusions GPT-5 demonstrated high guideline adherence but limited calibration to the quality of evidence underlying individual recommendations, with the potential to amplify the perceived certainty of low-quality evidence. Explicit incorporation of recommendation strength and evidence quality within prompts substantially improves calibration and may mitigate this risk in clinical use.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...