Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts: a systematic review
Yuhao Zhu1, Rong Tang2, Lingli Hu3
1Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Objective:
To evaluate current evidence on the safety and impact on ovarian reserve of single-port laparoscopic cystectomy (SLC) for the treatment of benign ovarian cysts.
Methods:
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to 31 December 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomized studies (NRSs) comparing SLC with conventional laparoscopic cystectomy (CLC) for benign ovarian cysts. The primary outcomes were postoperative changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and cosmetic outcomes. All analyses were performed using random-effects or fixed-effects models.
Results:
In total, 14 full-text studies involving 1, 691 participants were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between SLC and CLC in the incidence of intraoperative complications (P = 0.50), postoperative complications (P = 0.49), postoperative changes in serum AMH concentration (P = 0.06), estimated blood loss (P = 0.99), hemoglobin loss (P = 0.76), time to flatus (P = 0.68), length of hospital stay (P = 0.17), or analgesic use (P = 0.91). SLC was associated with significantly lower postoperative pain scores at 24 hours (P = 0.02) but longer operative time (P = 0.001) compared with CLC.
Conclusion:
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that SLC may be offered as a minimally invasive surgical alternative for women with benign ovarian cysts, at the cost of a longer operative time compared with CLC. Given the retrospective design of the majority of the included studies, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/, identifier CRD42024602477.
