Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Enrich and Expand Rare Antigen-specific T Cells with Magnetic Nanoparticles
Published on: November 17, 2018
Profiling immunogenic neoantigen peptides elicited by personalized neoantigen vaccine in cancer patients
Peng Zhao1, Clara Effenberger2, Saki Matsumoto2
1Laboratory of Immunogenomics, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics (CiDIG), National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition (NIBN), Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan.
Introduction:
Personalized neoantigen vaccines can induce antitumor T cell responses, but only 10-20% of selected peptides have induced immune responses in patients, underscoring the limitations of current prediction strategies.
Methods:
We analyzed a clinically annotated dataset from 352 cancer patients who received personalized neoantigen peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccines. We focused on 2,317 short peptides derived from single nucleotide variants for which post-vaccination T cell responses were evaluated by IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Immunogenic neoantigen peptides were defined as those inducing a ≥2.0-fold increase in IFN-γ ELISPOT responses after vaccination. We systematically examined peptide intrinsic characteristics and physicochemical properties, as well as predicted scores related to antigen-processing machinery.
Results And Discussion:
Immunogenicity was not associated with specific mutation positions or sequence patterns but was significantly correlated with higher hydrophobicity (P = 5.2 × 10-4). Among several predictive scores, peptides with higher binding affinity to HLA molecules (P = 0.0014 for NetMHC3, P = 0.028 for MHCflurry-affinity), higher binding stability (P = 0.043 for NetMHCstab) or better peptide presentation scores (P = 0.012 for mixmhcPred3, P = 0.0085 for MHCflurry-presentation) were significantly enriched among immunogenic neoantigen peptides. Composite models integrating peptide physicochemical features, particularly hydrophobicity, with prediction scores improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and balanced accuracy compared with individual tools alone. Together, these findings highlight the multifactorial determinants of neoantigen immunogenicity and support the integration of complementary peptide features to refine neoantigen prioritization for personalized vaccines and T cell-based immunotherapies.
More Related Videos
10:18Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
08:02In Vivo Immunogenicity Screening of Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles by Flow Cytometry of Splenic T Cells
Published on: September 23, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...