Automated three-dimensional ultrasound surveillance after endovascular aortic repair

Accurate measurement of the residual sac after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is essential for effective surveillance, guiding detection of complications and decisions regarding reintervention. While two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) remains standard-of-care, it is limited by operator variability. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) with modeling software has demonstrated improved precision but remains resource-intensive. The introduction of three-dimensional Software-Assisted Ultrasound (3D-SAUS) offers an automated, on-cart alternative for more streamlined clinical use. This study compares 3D-SAUS with 2D-US in measuring maximum residual sac diameter in EVAR patients, focusing on variability and clinical applicability.

Patients previously treated with EVAR and following US-based follow-up were scanned by three or four experienced ultrasound operators. The maximum anterior-posterior residual sac diameter was measured for all patients using 2D-US and 3D-SAUS. Outcomes were median and limits of agreement (LoA) with 95% confidence intervals for both modalities.

Fourteen EVAR-treated patients underwent 44 paired 2D-US and 3D-SAUS scans. Median maximum residual sac diameters were 50.0 mm with 2D-US and 50.3 mm with 3D-SAUS. LoA were 3.4 mm for 2D-US and 3.6 mm for 3D-SAUS, with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (2.2-4.6 mm and 2.5-4.7 mm, respectively). The difference in LoA was not statistically significant (P=0.61). Automatic technical success was achieved in 79% of the available 3D scans.

3D-SAUS demonstrated comparable residual sac diameter measurement precision and variability to expert 2D-US in post-EVAR patients. These findings support the potential of 3D-SAUS to enhance reproducibility and standardize ultrasound-based follow-up.