Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality of Life in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: ICF-Based Systematic Review
Ecem Kartal Ozcan1, Oyku Ozbas Kes1, Mustafa Karabulut2
1Department of Audiology, University of Health Sciences Faculty of Gulhane Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
The Journal of International Advanced Otology
|June 25, 2026
Summary
The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) is the most common tool for assessing quality of life in cochlear implant (CI) users. However, many PROMs, including the NCIQ, inadequately capture environmental factors impacting CI recipients.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Assessing quality of life (QoL) in adults with cochlear implants (CIs) is crucial for understanding treatment effectiveness.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are key tools for QoL assessment.
- The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) provides a framework for comprehensive health assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the most frequently used PROMs for QoL assessment in adult CI recipients.
- To evaluate how well these PROMs align with the domains of the ICF framework.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science.
- Included studies focused on adults with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss using standardized PROMs for QoL.
- PROMs were analyzed and mapped to ICF categories.
Main Results:
- Forty studies identified 13 distinct PROMs; the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) was most prevalent.
- The "activities and participation" domain was most frequently covered by PROMs.
- Several PROMs, including the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and EQ-5D, failed to address environmental factors.
Conclusions:
- The NCIQ is the leading PROM for CI users' QoL, but it has limitations.
- Many PROMs neglect crucial aspects like environmental factors, potentially missing real-world challenges.
- Adopting the ICF framework can enhance the comprehensiveness and relevance of PROMs for CI recipients.
