Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
Published on: February 28, 2021
Domain-Specific Computational, Functional and Structural Methods Enable Interpretation of BRCA1 BRCT Variants of
Gabriella C Torretto1,2, Matthew D Martin1,2, Kaamraan Islam2
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Background:
Pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants cause most hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Widespread genetic testing has revealed thousands of variants with unknown effects on disease risk, known as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). BRCA VUS, the majority of which are missense, complicate genetic test interpretation and clinical decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate BRCA1 VUS pathogenicity with enhanced accuracy through computational, functional and structural methods.
Methods:
We characterized the structural distribution of BRCA1 variants. In silico tools scored known consequence variants within a specific region of BRCA1. The Molecular Feature Selection Tool (MolecularFeaST; Renwick Lab at Queen's University; Kingston, ON, Canada) performed feature selection of the most discriminative tools. MATLAB (MATLAB R2024a; Mathworks; Natick, MA, USA) Classification Learner Application trained supervised machine learning models using combinations of the most accurate tools; the best model assigned pathogenicity prediction scores to VUS. Select VUS were functionally assessed through phosphopeptide binding pull-down assays and structurally analyzed on PyMOL (v2.4.1; Schrödinger Inc.; New York, NY, USA).
Results:
The RING and BRCT domains were identified as hotspots for missense pathogenic variants and VUS; BRCT was selected as the focus of the computational classifier. Nine in silico tools (CADD hg19, MetaRNN, ClinPred, VEST4, BayesDel AD, EVE, Eigen PC, gMVP and PolyPhen2) defined the BRCT-specific missense variant classifier. Twenty-two VUS (R1699P, F1704S, W1837L, W1712G, F1734S, V1804A, I1674V, V1804L, V1804I, I1807V, T1675S, I1764L, N1774I, E1698K, Q1848K, P1749S, A1669T, N1774H, L1839V, T1658I, L1705I, V1654L) demonstrated varying phosphopeptide binding ability and protein levels relative to the wildtype. Computational structural modeling contextualized VUS phosphopeptide interactions and structural implications.
Conclusions:
We provide in silico and functional evidence for the classification of BRCA1 BRCT VUS and highlight the utility of domain-specific computational approaches for characterizing missense variants in multi-domain genes.
More Related Videos
08:53Identifying the Effects of BRCA1 Mutations on Homologous Recombination using Cells that Express Endogenous Wild-type BRCA1
Published on: February 17, 2011
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014